CHINESE regulators have tightened control over microblogs, ordering operators to set up a mechanism to remove false information after the most popular service was criticised for allowing prohibited material to spread.
The order adds to new measures imposed by the government of President Xi Jinping to tighten control over what China’s public can see and say online – while still trying to reap the economic benefits of internet use.
Microblog operators must set up a mechanism to monitor accounts for false information and delete it, under an order by the Cyberspace Administration of China. It said operators must keep a copy of what users post for six months.
The ruling Communist Party encourages internet and social media use for business and education, but has steadily tightened control to block material deemed subversive, pornographic or socially unhealthy.
Last weekend, Sina Weibo was ordered to suspend some services for one week after authorities accused it of allowing material promoting “wrong public opinion orientation”, obscenity and “ethnic discrimination”.
This followed a report that Sina Weibo managers found some celebrities and companies paid marketing firms to make them appear more popular by creating fake accounts to increase their number of online followers.
Sina Weibo said it had 376 million active users as of September.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here