ABERDEEN hope to begin building their new £50 million stadium in the summer after their planning application was approved by the city council.
Councillors voted 32-9 to approve plans for a 20,000-seat stadium and training facilities at Kingsford, near Westhill – seven miles west of the city.
However, it emerged that related plans for parking facilities and a footbridge have to go through Aberdeenshire Council, which has previously raised objections.
A campaign group has already announced its intention to force a judicial review and the Scottish Government could have the final say on the £50m proposals.
But Aberdeen chairman Stewart Milne feels the decision is a major step forward to finding an alternative home to Pittodrie.
Milne said: "This is another big step along the way. It has still got to go to the Scottish Government and be cleared by them. I would hope we get that clearance during March.
"There's obviously quite a lot of legal issues that need to be tied up but, all being well, we hope to be on site in the summer and have the first phase delivered by summer next year. The target at the moment is that we can start playing there in season 2021-22."
The No Kingsford Stadium campaign group immediately vowed to step up its bid to prevent the development going ahead on green belt land.
A statement read: "We have shown that the application is contrary to the development plan and our position is supported by the strategic planning authority, Aberdeenshire Council and the local community councils. We commissioned an independent review of the economic case which found that AFC had 'grossly overestimated' the impact.
"It is our view that council officials and councillors have failed in their duty to apply the law in this case and we will now progress our petition for judicial review."
However, Milne is confident that challenge will be overcome.
"There's the potential that it could cause delays," he said. "They can challenge the planning decision, they can put in a legal challenge in respect to the due processes that is being gone through by the council.
"I think there's evidence there today just how thorough the council have been in appraising the application. So we would be most surprised if there were grounds for a legal challenge."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel