A FIRE that spread through a South Korean hospital with no sprinkler system has killed at least 37 people, many of them elderly, and injured more than 140 others.
The fire started in Sejong Hospital’s emergency room yesterday morning and had engulfed the first floor when firefighters arrived.
They approached the second floor through the windows to rescue trapped patients, with the flames extinguished before reaching the third floor.
The cause of the fire was not immediately known. The hospital’s operations were suspended after the fire.
All the dead were from the hospital’s general ward, while all 94 people being cared for in a nursing ward for the elderly were safely evacuated after the fire, some carried on the backs of firefighters.
Most of the dead were being treated for respiratory diseases in an intensive-care unit on the second floor. Three of the dead worked at the hospital.
Son Kyung-cheol, head of the foundation that operates the hospital, said in a televised briefing that the hospital did not have sprinklers as it was not required by law.
Most of the deaths appeared to be due to suffocation, with only one suffering burns.
President Moon Jae-in expressed regret over the blaze at an emergency meeting convened with his senior advisers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here