CONTRACTORS of Edinburgh’s troubled tram line used “whatever means they could” to delay the project, an inquiry heard yesterday.
Edinburgh’s former head of transport Marshall Poulton said he felt “tactics” were being used by Bilfinger to stall the development, although they were “entitled” to within their contract terms.
The probe, chaired by retired judge Lord Hardie, is examining why the project was so over-budget and delivered years later than first planned.
Speaking at the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, Poulton said: “It just seemed to me at a point there was always an issue and there wasn’t a willingness to get together to see a way out – everything seemed to go to dispute.
“It was a personal opinion by myself and it was shared with Tram Internal Planning Group members.
“I just felt the tactics that were being deployed, they were using whatever means they could to stall things.”
Although he said he believed this was the case, he failed to raise it with project managers Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (TIE).
Ross McClelland, counsel to the inquiry, put it to Poulton that money could have been saved if he had urged the body to resolve the dispute.
However, Poulton said it was not in his “remit” to advise TIE so raised it with council and project bosses instead.
The eventual £776 million bill was more than double the sum earmarked at the outset by the Scottish Parliament’s then Labour-led administration.
Poulton, who worked for City of Edinburgh Council between 2008 and 2013, also told the inquiry he spent little time overseeing the project.
This was despite him being made tram monitoring officer during part of his tenure as head of department.
He said the scheme accounted for “five per cent” of his workload, but admitted it should have taken up someone’s full attention.
Poulton, who was the project’s monitoring officer throughout 2009 and 2010, said: “Hindsight is a great thing. There was an underestimation of the role.”
The inquiry is due to continue in February.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here