FORMER international football star George Weah has been sworn into office as Liberia’s new president.
He took over the leadership of the post-war, impoverished West African nation from Africa’s first female president.
The 51-year-old, who was Fifa’s 1995 Player of the Year, won the run-off vote on December 26 against the outgoing vice-president.
President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf served for 12 years, lifting Liberia from the destruction of back-to-back civil wars that ended before her tenure and facing the challenge of the Ebola crisis that killed thousands in the country.
Weah, dressed in all white, stood at the podium amid tens of thousands of cheering Liberians, taking the oath of office around midday yesterday.
Thousands of people had stormed the field early in the day to get a chance to see the new president sworn in.
Weah, who has run for the presidency before but is relatively new to national politics, inherits a weak economy along with poor health and educational sectors.
Liberians held prayer services for 48 hours leading up to the inauguration of Weah, who served three years in the senate more than a decade after retiring from a glittering international football career in which he played in France, Italy, the UK and elsewhere.
His running mate, vice-president-elect Jewel Howard-Taylor, has political experience that surpasses his.
She was married to the nation’s former leader Charles Taylor during his time in power. After they divorced, she was elected senator in 2005, building a political career in her own right.
Many of Weah’s critics are still sceptical about his ability to deliver in a country that is faced with youth unemployment and other challenges.
Weah’s new government should launch a “self-sufficiency in food programme” to boost agriculture and tackle the problem of unemployment, said James Mulbah, an agricultural extension expert. “Any country that does not feed itself, you are at the mercy of those that will feed you, that has been the problem in this country and it has continued to exist,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here