NIGEL Farage has called for a second referendum on EU membership to “kill off the issue for a generation once and for all.”
The former Ukip leader made the suggestion yesterday, saying he wanted to put an end to “whinging and whining” by opponents of Brexit.
Appearing on a television show, he said: “What is for certain is that the Cleggs, the Blairs, the Adonises will never, ever, ever give up. They will go on whinging and whining and moaning all the way through this process.
“So maybe, just maybe, I’m reaching the point of thinking that we should have a second referendum on EU membership – unless you want to have a multiple-choice referendum which would confuse people.
“I think that if we had a second referendum on EU membership we would kill it off for a generation.
“The percentage that would vote to leave next time would be very much bigger than it was last time round. And we may just finish the whole thing off. And Blair can disappear off into total obscurity.”
During last year’s snap General Election, Ukip made opposing a second referendum on Scottish independence a top priority.
“The Scottish economy will not grow while there is the uncertainty of a second independence referendum,” the party warned in their manifesto, adding that there was no point in “arguing about referendums past”.
Later on the manifesto Ukip added it would be wrong to “fall into the neverendum trap”.
SNP MEP Alyn Smith suggested there was something fishy about the Eurosceptic’s call: “I’m wary of letting Farage make the news.
“He knows that the Brexit promises are empty and will be found wanting, so it may well suit him to rerun the debate before the chickens have come home to roost and he can blame the Tories as patsies.
“But Scotland’s position is already clear and has been from the start. We did not buy his snake oil and it is clear that Brexit – any sort of Brexit – is against Scotland’s best interests.”
Tom Harris, who ran the Leave campaign in Scotland, argued that there was no need for a new vote.
He said: “Suddenly a lot of Remainers seem to think Nigel Farage is someone worth listening to.
“I would oppose such a vote. The decision to Leave has been taken. Now it’s a question of terms.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel