SPRINTER Justin Gatlin has said he was “shocked and surprised” when he learned that his coach Dennis Mitchell allegedly offered to supply performance-enhancing drugs.
In a statement on his Instagram account, the reigning 100 metres world champion also denied doping and threatened legal action against anybody who claims otherwise.
Gatlin’s comments come after undercover reporters from the Daily Telegraph filmed Mitchell and another member of the American sprinter’s entourage, athletics agent Robert Wagner, allegedly offering to obtain banned drugs for an actor training for a film.
Mitchell and Wagner have both denied wrong-doing.
“I am not using and have not used PEDs (performance-enhancing drugs),” wrote Gatlin, who has twice served doping bans during a controversial career.
“I was shocked and surprised to learn that my coach would have anything to do with even the appearance of these current accusations. I fired him as soon as I found out about this.
“All legal options are on the table and I will not allow others to lie about me like this.
“I have no further comments as it is now a legal matter. They will next hear from my lawyer.”
According to the newspaper, its reporters visited Gatlin’s Florida training camp and the pair offered to obtain and administer human growth hormone and testosterone for $250,000 (£187,000). The drugs, it is claimed in the report, would have been sourced from a doctor in Austria.
Perhaps even more damaging for athletics in general, though, are the secret recordings of Mitchell and Wagner claiming that doping is still widespread in the sport.
The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU), the new body set up by athletics’ world governing body the IAAF to oversee all anti-doping matters in the sport, are investigating the allegations.
In a statement, USADA said: “Investigations stemming from tips and whistleblowers play a critical role in anti-doping efforts.
“We are presently coordinating with the Athletics Integrity Unit in order to investigate these claims fully. As with all investigations, we encourage individuals with information to come forward as an important tool to help protect clean athletes.
“Importantly, individuals are innocent unless and until the established process determines otherwise. It’s only fair to let due process occur before jumping to any conclusions.”
AIU boss Brett Clothier said: “These allegations are very serious and strike at the heart of the integrity of athletics.
“The IAAF anti-doping code and code of conduct applies not just to athletes, but also athlete support personnel. The Athletics Integrity Unit will be investigating this matter in co-operation with USADA and we hope the Daily Telegraph will provide information to assist.
“The use of new methodologies and designer drugs has always been a challenge for the anti-doping movement and this continues to this day. In this era, we understand that we cannot rely on testing alone to defend the sport against doping and so the AIU is both building its investigations and intelligence capability and implementing an intelligence based re-testing policy to meet such challenges.”
IAAF president Lord Coe described the allegations as “extremely serious”.
Gatlin won 100m gold at the World Championships in London this summer, triumphing over Usain Bolt.
His victory was greeted by boos from the crowd – a response he has become used to after serving bans for testing positive for a banned amphetamine and testosterone. Gatlin has always denied deliberately doping.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here