MANY species of bird will suffer if proposals to build a golf course at Coul Links go ahead, according to RSPB Scotland.
The conservation charity will today submit its objection to the development which plans to build an 18-hole championship course on the area near Embo at East Sutherland.
The charity is warning that the natural flooded dunes on the site provide refuge during winter months for wigeon and teal, while a wide range of red and amber listed species of conservation concern nest amongst the dunes during spring.
There are worries that birdlife will suffer as a result of important wetland habitat being “effectively drained and replaced by golf greens”.
American multi-millionaires Mike Keiser and Todd Warnock are behind the proposals and believe the gold course will benefit the local economy.
The project manager for the development has defended the proposals, saying that the development will only affect a small part of the overall site and will help to “prevent the site being lost”, and accused the RSPB of spreading misinformation.
Last month RSPB Scotland joined a group of conservation charities – including the Scottish Wildlife Trust and the Marine Conservation Society – to submit an objection to the planning application.
Now they are warning that given how rare a habitat Coul Links is for the species of birds, moving or relocating it will not work.
“There’s a reason why Coul Links is so heavily protected through national and European designations – it’s an outstanding place for nature and an incredibly rare habitat,” said Alison Searl, conservation officer at RSPB Scotland.
“It cannot be moved or replicated elsewhere; should these proposals be given the go ahead the amazing place would be lost forever and the impact on the birds currently found here throughout the year would be serious.”
“The number of objections to these plans shows just how widespread concerns about them are not only from conservation organisations, including one from SEPA this week, but also local people who are worried about the impact the golf course would have.”
However, Chris Haspell, project manager for Coul Links development, hit back at the RSPB for their “inaccuracies”. He said their research into the impacts of the golf course ran contrary to the charity’s claims.
“Detailed studies have taken place at Coul Links in relation to the potential impacts of the proposed development,” said Haspell. “Scottish National Heritage and our team agree on this and these have simply been ignored by the RSPB in their latest inaccurate and inexplicable comments.
“The development touches on less than two per cent of the overall site.
“Far from destroying this important habitat, the Coul Links proposal represents the only funded management plan to prevent the site being lost.
He added: “Ironically, the two species they’ve highlighted – wigeon and teal – are actually directly threatened by the RSPB’s plans. At present, these birds are legally shot throughout the winter, but as part of the mitigation outlined by our proposed golf course, this shooting would permanently cease.
“If the RSPB has its way the shooting, and its associated disturbance within the designated site, will continue – the first time we are aware of the RSPB lobbying for the continued shooting of birds within a designated site.
“Their comments are so laced with inaccuracies that we have decided to write to the RSPB Council to register our concern that RSPB Scotland should issue what appears to be deliberate misinformation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel