THE Queen’s private estate has been found to have millions of pounds invested in offshore tax havens, according to reports.
A vast tranche of the leaked financial documents, dubbed the Paradise Papers, have been analysed by media organisations, including the BBC and The Guardian.
It is alleged that the Duchy of Lancaster, which handles the Queen’s investments, has held
funds in the Cayman Islands
and Bermuda.
Around £10 million of the Queen’s private cash is said to have been tied up in offshore portfolios, the BBC reported.
There is nothing to suggest that any investments are illegal, the broadcaster added.
Around 13.4 million files are said to have been involved in the leak, which comes one year after the disclosure of the Panama Papers sent shockwaves through the world of business.
Two offshore service providers are said to be the source of the material, along with the company registries of 19 tax havens.
First obtained by the German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung, the documents have reportedly been analysed by almost 100 media organisations.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists oversaw the project, it is claimed.
Hundreds of individuals and companies are said to have their overseas tax affairs laid bare in the papers. US President Donald Trump’s commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, is allegedly shown to have cash in a shipping company which deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s son-in-law.
The Russian firm Navigator Holdings, in which the offshore investments are reportedly held, has a partnership with Sibur, a gas company co-owned by Kirill Shamalov, who is married
to Putin’s daughter.
The Paradise Papers allegedly reveal that several major global companies have been exploiting offshore schemes to avoid tax.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said the disclosure “proves” that “there’s one rule for the super-rich and another for the rest when it comes to paying tax”.
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell said: “These are deeply worrying revelations. Despite all the Government’s claims of cracking down on tax dodgers, this evidence confirms that tax avoidance is clearly continuing on an industrial scale.
“Either the Prime Minister or the Chancellor needs to explain how this scandalous behaviour has been allowed to go on unaddressed for so long and what action is to be taken now.”
It is claimed that a small portion of the Queen’s investments – £3208 – was found to have bought a holding in the lender BrightHouse. The rent-to-buy firm has previously been accused of ripping off customers with high interest rates, but maintains it does responsible business.
Cash ended up in BrightHouse via a company called Dover Street VI Cayman Fund LP, in which the Duchy of Lancaster reportedly invested $7.5m (£5.73m) in 2005.
The organisation bought an interest in a project involved in the takeover of BrightHouse and Threshers, which went bust.
A further £5 million was invested in 2004 in the Bermuda-based Jubilee Absolute Return Fund Ltd.
A spokesman for the Duchy of Lancaster said: “We operate a number of investments and a few of these are with overseas funds. All of our investments are fully audited and legitimate.”
The Dover Street investment is said to form only 0.3 per cent of the total value of the Duchy. The Duchy’s investment in BrightHouse, meanwhile, totals 0.0006 per cent of the Duchy’s value.
The Queen voluntarily pays tax on income she receives from the Duchy.
A UK Government spokeswoman said: “Since 2010, the Government has secured an additional £160 billion, more than the annual UK NHS budget, for our vital public services by tackling tax avoidance, evasion and non-compliance.
“This includes more than £2.8bn from those trying to hide money abroad to avoid paying what
they owe.
“There are 26,000 HMRC staff tackling tax avoidance and evasion, and we have provided an extra £800m to fund their efforts.
“A fair tax system is a critical and key part of our plan to build a fairer society, and we are clear that everyone must pay what is due, at the right time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel