TORY Business Minister Claire Perry has told Scots to cheer up and stop being so miserable over the UK Government’s decision to scrap a billion pound carbon capture scheme which would have created 600 jobs.
MPs were debating the government’s Clean Growth Strategy, which included plans to revive carbon capture technology.
But two years ago, in one of his final acts as Chancellor, George Osborne scrapped a £1bn competition to develop the technology that sucks carbon dioxide out of the air, neutralising it and, effectively, creating “negative emissions”.
Shell and SSE had spent years working on the technology at Peterhead Power Station, and it was at an advanced stage, when the Government pulled the plug.
In the Westminster Hall debate on Thursday, SNP MP Drew Hendry warned those expecting big things from the Government’s programme to be aware of what happened to Peterhead.
“There was a shameful decision by the UK government to pull the plug in the long planned development at Peterhead, where we saw, with no warning, a huge damaging decision to create a legacy that would deter investment incentives and dent consumer confidence. It was a manifesto betrayal," he said. "This was in the manifesto that this would go ahead. It cost the taxpayer £100m. Peterhead was set and ready to accept a billion pound grant and expected 600 jobs.”
He added: “George Osborne, by axing it at the 11th hour, created what could only be described as a betrayal of the people of Peterhead."
Hendry said the Government strategy was not putting enough into the technology to make it worthwhile.
“Even now this commitment to Carbon Capture Storage, welcome though this small u-turn is, is still fairly mealy mouthed, because if you look at the detail it says says subject to cost reduction, that’s the bare minimum of commitment.
“The Carbon Capture Storage Association have pointed out this is counter to how technology actually develops, you have to invest to get the experience and drive costs down.
“It’s very difficult to see how energy policy cherry picked in this way with these policy announcements and these u-turns is going to provide a cohesive way forward for the industry.”
Perry told SNP MP to be a bit more cheerful.
“I know that the marching orders for the SNP... is that they have to be as gloomy as possible about everything at all times, but I will frankly say it’s really very sad that he hasn’t paid reference today to the high wind offshore floating wind plant, one of the most innovative and creative things that’s being done.
“That’s being done by the UK Government, because this is not a devolved matter, as he knows, and that has been done because actually it was the combination of the policy, government leadership, working with industry to drive the cost down for offshore wind, exactly as we propose to do with this technology.
“So let’s focus on what can be delivered and acknowledge that no country in the world is taking a major step into unreformed CCS at the moment, and we do want to do this together, so perhaps just a bit more cheerfulness from north of the border.”
Hendry said it was now “quite common” to Tory ministers to tell people just to “hope for the best”.
He continued: “No amount of deflection from the minister will get away from the point that the UK government, at the 11th hour, cancelled the Peterhead project with no warning to the people that were involved. And that is shameful."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel