BARCELONA president Josep Maria Bartomeu has defended the decision to play Sunday’s match against Las Palmas behind closed doors.
The LaLiga leaders played at an empty Nou Camp after a request to have the game postponed, amid widespread political unrest in Catalonia, was turned down.
News the game would go ahead was communicated just 20 minutes before the scheduled kick-off with thousands of supporters locked out.
Across the region around 850 people were injured in clashes with police as the people of Catalonia voted in an independence referendum.
Barcelona’s decision has attracted criticism from both sides of the independence debate but Bartomeu is convinced it was the best way for the club to protest against the actions of police and government.
Bartomeu said in a statement: “Yesterday we expressed our rejection and vehement condemnation of the serious events that we experienced in our country, with abusive and indiscriminate use of force to prevent millions of people from exercising the right to vote.
“In this context, here at FC Barcelona we decided that we had to take some kind of measure to show our indignation to the world.
“I finally decided that we would play the game, but as an exceptional measure, behind closed doors.
“We perfectly understand that many of our members and fans would have preferred the option of calling off the match.
“We very seriously considered the option of postponing the game, but we could not get the Liga de Futbol Profesional to approve our request.”
Barcelona could have faced a six-point penalty had they opted not to play the game, which they won 3-0.
Former Barca manager Pep Guardiola was among those to have criticised the decision to play.
The Catalan told Catalunya Radio: “I wouldn’t have played the game, not at all.
“And if it did have to be played, then not behind closed doors. You do it with the public there. With all the consequences.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel