A WHOPPING 88 per cent of Leave voters in England are willing to accept Scottish independence in order to ensure the UK leaves the European Union, according to new research.
A study carried out by the University of Edinburgh in conjunction with Cardiff University found that almost nine in 10 respondents said that a majority of Yes voters in any future Scottish independence referendum was an acceptable price to pay in order to “take back control”.
The findings, taken from the latest Future of England survey – the findings of which will be presented tomorrow at a fringe meeting of the Conservative Party's Annual Conference in Manchester – also found that 81 per cent of respondents felt that destabilising the Northern Ireland peace process would be worthwhile to see the UK exit the European Union.
Speaking ahead of the meeting, Professor Ailsa Henderson, professor of political science at the University of Edinburgh, said: “It’s evident from the data just how high a price many leave voters would be willing to pay to make Brexit a success. What’s perhaps most remarkable is the substantial proportion of Conservative supporters that are willing to risk the breakup of the UK to see Brexit happen”.
Other findings include that Conservative-supporting leave voters are also more likely to countenance the breakup of the UK, with 92 per cent prepared to accept Scotland voting for independence. That compares to 78 per cent of Labour-supporting Leave voters who were posed the same question.
By the same token, 87 per cent of Conservative supporting leave voters would be willing to risk jeopardising Northern Ireland’s peace process (compared to 67 per cent of Labour supporting Leave voters).
“For well over a century, the Conservative and Unionist Party has been the party most associated with defending the Union,” said Professor Richard Wyn Jones, director of Cardiff University's Wales Governance Centre.
“But with such a high proportion of the party’s supporters willing to sacrifice the Union to ‘take back control’, it might well be time to ask whether the party still lives up to that name,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel