SCOTLAND's largest local authority should know by Friday if any of the high rise flats in its area have a "Grenfell type arrangement" of combustible cladding, MSPs have been told.
A week ago it emerged that 57 privately owned high rise properties in the Glasgow City Council area could have similar cladding to that on the London tower block, which was destroyed by a massive inferno claiming an estimated 80 lives.
On Wednesday, MSPs were told the local authority should be able to provide the "clarity" required on the nature and extent of the cladding on these buildings by the end of this week.
Staff from the Scottish Government went to Glasgow Council yesterday to help officials there provide the necessary information, Holyrood's Housing Minister said.
Kevin Stewart added: "Glasgow City Council have a responsibility to residents to progress this work as a matter of urgency."
MSPs on the Scottish Parliament's Local Government Committee had heard last week from a senior official on the council that a search in the aftermath of the Grenfell fire tragedy had found combustible cladding on some private flats - but the council had not gone public and informed the owners of the buildings.
Raymond Barlow, the assistant head of planning and building standards at Glasgow City Council, said at the time the authority had been waiting to hear from the Scottish Government on the issue.
Stewart however complained of a "lack of detail" in the information passed from the authority to a ministerial working group set up to probe building and fire safety.
Bill Dodds, the head of building standards at the Scottish Government, said it was "mainly clarity around the extend of the cladding" they were seeking.
He told the committee: "The majority of the requests for clarity are around the age of the building, the height of the building the extent of the cladding material and so on.
"It's quite important to clarify in Grenfell the entire building was overclad with ACM (aluminium composite material), it was a complete enclosure of ACM material so what we're trying to do is establish whether we have a Greenfell type arrangement where the building is completely overclad in ACM product or if it is in isolated areas, that's the clarity we're asking.
"That request has gone back almost line by line now asking for that additional clarity, and we've been given a reassurance we will get that clarity hopefully by the end of next week."
Stewart confirmed he had received an email from the Government officials sent into the Glasgow this morning "which says they are on track to complete the necessary work by the end of this week".
He pledged: "I will be keeping a close tab to make sure that work is completed as soon as it possibly can be, because we need to take actions necessary coming from the completed information we receive."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here