THE Mars Observer spacecraft was launched towards the red planet by Nasa 25 years ago today. It was the first US mission to Mars for 18 years, and professional and amateur astronomers worldwide stood by to follow every development.
It was a hugely ambitious project, costing more than $820m, which was designed to be the most comprehensive survey of Mars by humankind to that date. Except, of course, that the Observer never quite made it
to Mars…
SO WHAT WAS IT ALL ABOUT?
Last seen by the human eye in its launch phase high aboard the Commercial Titan III rocket, the 5,000lbs-plus Observer was clearly based on the kind of satellite that was already successfully mapping every inch of Earth.
Its aim was simple – to fly to Mars, get into orbit around the planet and find enough detail about its magnetic fields, its surface and atmosphere, and especially the climates of Mars past and present, so that future exploration could be targeted at areas that might, just might, be able to support human life.
The sub-text, as always with Martian exploration, was to see if any form of life could be found there, and the Observer was especially equipped to find any traces of water, without which life cannot be sustained – as far as we know.
The Mariner and Viking missions had suggested that water had indeed flowed on Mars at one time in its more than 4 billion year history, but liquid water as we know it cannot exist on the planet surface due to the near absence of atmospheric pressure. However, the polar ice caps appear to be frozen water, and that was why Observer was going to spend a lot of time orbiting them.
SO HOW DID IT DO?
It all went well at first. The Titan booster rocket cleared the launchpad at Cape Canaveral in Florida and put Observer into Earth orbit, where the Transfer Orbit Stage ignited to put Mars Observer into a trajectory that would take the spacecraft towards Mars in a journey that would last 11 months.
SO FAR, SO GOOD?
Apart from a mid-course correction, Observer was working well and sending back data and images from space via its powerful communication system. These included pictures of Mars as the Observer got closer and closer.
When it reached Mars orbit, the aim was for the Observer to enter an elliptical orbit and spend an entire Martian year – about 21 Earth months – collecting data that would include the first global map of the planet that is our nearest planetary neighbour.
Observer had plenty fuel on board to last out that Martian year, and it also had a solar array collecting precious power for its fuel cells. Amongst the equipment on board was one of the most accurate laser altimeters ever designed, which would give a detailed topography of a planet already well known to have mountains and canyons, plus a highly sensitive camera and a gamma ray spectrometer to measure gamma rays and neutrons emitted by radioactive decay of elements on the surface. The hope was that this would provide a real clue about how Mars developed over aeons.
It was intended that Observer would gradually attain a circular orbit around Mars from pole to pole that would see it travel around the planet every two hours. In short, the Observer would tell us much, much more about Mars than we had ever known.
SO WHAT HAPPENED?
In the mission control room at Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, everything seemed to be going well and confidence was high that Mars Observer would at least reach its target and begin transmitting data.
On August 21, 1993, all communications were lost instantaneously. Television pictures at the time showed the shock on the Nasa scientists’ faces as the realisation sank in. The spacecraft was just three days from entering the orbit around Mars.
The flight managers tried everything they could to re-establish contact with Observer, including sending signals every 20 minutes for hours on end, but finally they had to conclude that Observer was defunct.
EMBARRASSING OR WHAT?
It was indeed a massive embarrassment for Nasa, but anyone with any idea about the vast difficulties of sending a spacecraft 40-plus million miles to another planet and getting it to send back data realised that Observer did well just to get to where it did. It was hugely disappointing, however, to the expectant space community and adversely affected Nasa’s prestige.
SO WHAT WENT WRONG?
The most probable cause of the loss of Observer, according to the final official report, was “rupture of the fuel (monomethyl hydrazine – MMH) pressurisation side of the spacecraft’s propulsion system, resulting in a pressurised leak of both helium gas and liquid MMH under the spacecraft’s thermal blanket.” Immediate doom, in other words.
WILL WE EVER SEE HUMANS ON MARS?
It is the next great challenge in space exploration, and many missions have taken place since Observer so we know much more about the planet, including the fact that water did indeed once flow there.
We also now know that putting humans on Mars is theoretically possible.
And anyway, Donald Trump says we are going, and has pledged $19.1 billion (£14bn) to Nasa for the project. So that’s it in the bag, then.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel