SCOTTISH Labour leader hopeful Anas Sarwar says his family’s business doesn’t pay the real living wage because it doesn’t have to.
In a brutal interview on the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland radio programme, the Glasgow MSP also denied that being a millionaire, who sends his children to a £10,000-a-year private school meant he was “one of the few”.
Sarwar owns around a quarter of the shares in his family’s United Wholesale (Scotland) Ltd, worth an estimated £4.8m.
The Sunday Herald reported recently that the firm paid staff at £7.50 an hour, lower than the £8.45 real living wage championed by Scottish Labour.
The cash-and-carry also has no formal trade union recognition in place for its 250 staff, which, Sarwar said, was down to no union ever asking to be established.
Sarwar was asked if he was one of the “few”, despite Jeremy Corbyn promising to stand up for “the many, not the few”.
He replied: "No I don't accept that at all. The reason I’m in the Labour party is because I don’t choose to opt out of politics. I choose to fight for equality, to fight for opportunity. That’s why I’m in the Labour party.”
Asked if the pay at UWS undermined his credibility, he answered: “The difference is I don’t support a voluntary real living wage. I support a mandatory real living wage. I don’t think it’s right that the market dictates what a fair day’s pay is, and that’s why I want it to be a compulsory policy.”
He added that he had no real influence in the company: “One, I’m a minority shareholder in the company.
“Second, I have no role in the company. I’m not a director in the company. I have no say in how the company operates.
“But I have had assurances from the company that they do want to transition to a real living wage for all employees.
“They too have welcomed the fact that a Labour government would introduce a real living wage much quicker than the current UK government, meaning they’d be able to implement it quicker, and also so it’s compulsory on every company.
“I don’t care who the shareholder of any company is, I don’t care which company it is, I want every company to be mandated by the government to pay the real living wage and not use the market as the excuse.”
It was a tough interview for the politician. His rival for the top job, Richard Leonard, had a much easier time of it, though faced difficult questions over Labour’s reluctance to pay out over equal pay claims at Glasgow City Council.
When Sarwar was asked about sending his offspring sons to the £10,000-a-year Hutchesons’ Grammar instead of any of the local comprehensives, he criticised the host..
“Again, Gary, I would rather you focused on the policy,” he said.
He added: “It’s clear you only want to focus on policy with one candidate, not the other, which I think is unfortunate.
“But directly answering the question on that, that’s a decision that my wife and I took.
“That’s a decision we made as a couple. I’m sure people would respect decisions that are made by any couple in the privacy of their own home.
“What I would say is, the fact is too many of our schools aren’t good enough in Scotland.
Too many of our teachers aren’t getting the resources they need.
“We have 4000 fewer teachers in our school system [under the SNP]. That’s not acceptable. I want opportunity for all children, and that’s why we need to increase the tax rate.”
In the coming weeks, only subscribers will be able to comment on The National articles. Subscribe now or log in to make sure you stay a part of the conversation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions. What should we do with our second vote in 2021? What happens if Westminster says no to indyref2?
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversation, register under fake names, and post vile abuse. We’ve had hundreds of emails from you complaining about this, asking us to take steps to ensure that these people aren’t given a platform on our site.
We’re listening to you, and here’s how we plan to make that happen.
We have decided to make the ability to comment only available to our 10,000 paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them.
We’ll be monitoring this change over the first few weeks, and we’re keen to know your thoughts. Email us at letters@thenational.scot if you want to have your say.
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Last Updated:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Report This Comment