EDINBURGH has been exposed as having the lowest food hygiene standards in Scotland and the Orkney Islands has the highest, according to consumer watchdog figures.
An investigation by Which? reveals a large degree of variation in food hygiene standards across Scotland, with some council areas much better at ensuring that their local businesses are complying with hygiene rules than others.
Researchers analysed 32 local authorities using data submitted to Food Standards Scotland (FSS) and ranked them based on the proportion of medium and high risk premises meeting hygiene requirements, total premises rated for risk, and the proportion of planned interventions such as inspections or follow-up actions the authorities achieved.
The results of Which?’s analysis found that Edinburgh is ranked bottom in Scotland, and is the eighth-lowest ranking local authority area in the UK. Glasgow achieved the second lowest score in the country.
Seven local authority areas in Scotland, including Aberdeen, Moray, Clackmannanshire, Falkirk, Perth & Kinross, Glasgow and Edinburgh were ranked in the bottom 10 per cent across the UK. Just 57 per cent of medium- and high-risk businesses in Falkirk met compliance levels for food safety.
However, the Orkney Islands, followed by North Lanarkshire, topped the table for food hygiene in Scotland and finished seventh in the UK overall.
The FSA and FSS review will now look at options such as tighter checks when a food business opens and how data from businesses can be used more effectively. However, Which? is concerned that proposed reforms could see a potential shift towards more inspections being carried out by third parties employed by firms in place of checks by public authorities.
Which? is calling on the regulators to ensure that a robust food standards system is put in place that serves consumer interests and avoids any conflicts of interest and insisted that in a landscape that is heavily underpinned by EU regulation, a comprehensive strategy for enforcement post-Brexit is needed.
Alex Neill, the consumers' association managing director of home services, said: “As we prepare to leave the EU, the Government and regulators need to ensure that there is a robust, independent system of enforcement in place to give people confidence that the food they’re eating is hygienic.”
Edinburgh City Council said its team carries out robust checks on food premises, adding: “The Council does not accept that the database was designed to rank authorities in the way suggested. Many non-compliances used to achieve this ranking are often technical in nature which in no way puts the public at risk.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here