THE chairwoman of Scotland’s historical child abuse inquiry is to be urged to hold public evidence sessions across the country when she announces how her work is progressing next week.
Alan Draper, of survivor organisation In Care Abuse Survivors (Incas) made the appeal to senior judge Lady Smith ahead of a key preliminary hearing of the inquiry on Tuesday at Parliament House in Edinburgh.
Draper said: “I hope she will be announcing oral evidence sessions in different parts of the country as it will make it easier for survivors, many of whom are now elderly, to take part.”
“It is to be welcomed that this hearing is taking place, although we would have liked it sooner.”
Draper said he hoped Smith would also respond positively to calls from survivors for interim payments as part of their demands for redress.
Smith is expected to set out a timetable for victims to take part and update the public on progress.
The inquiry has cost more than £2.5million and has been beset with problems including the resignation of its previous chairwoman Susan O’Brien QC and a panel member Professor Michael Lamb.
Smith had been under pressure to expand the remit of the inquiry to include people abused who were not in residential care, but has ruled out doing so.
She rejected the idea, saying the inquiry is already extensive and had gathered many “accounts of abuse”. An online message by the judge last year stated: “The terms of the remit were set when the inquiry began.
‘Their width enables us to investigate the abuse of children in residential care in Scotland... from within the living memory of anyone who suffered such abuse to the end of 2014.”
It is believed that more than 20,000 victims could come forward by the end of the inquiry. Police Scotland warned the increase in its workload could put it under growing pressure.
The Scottish Government has said that where crimes are uncovered, the “full force of the law” will be used to bring those responsible to justice.
No oral evidence will be heard on Tuesday but the preliminary hearing is open to the public.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here