CONTROVERSIAL plans for a world-class golf course in Sutherland are under threat after leading conservation groups called for the scheme to be withdrawn.
US golf entrepreneurs Mike Keiser and Todd Warnock hope to transform land at Coul near Embo into an 805-acre, 18-hole course.
But some conservationists have already called for surveys for the Fonseca’s seed fly, which they say is only found in the dune system on this particular stretch of coastline.
Scotland’s leading conservation charities are calling on developers to withdraw plans for the golf course on unspoiled coastal site rich in wildlife.
The Scottish Wildlife Trust, RSPB Scotland, BugLife and Plantlife Scotland have come together to stop the project.
The partnership is highlighting its importance for wildlife and the fragility of its habitats. The partnership wrote yesterday to the developers urging them to think again.
It stated that it fully expects the government agency Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) to share its concerns about the proposal, and that it would make a full submission detailing its objections if the proposal goes forward into the planning process.
Coul Links are protected as part of the Dornoch Firth and Loch Fleet Special Protection Area which has been designated for its importance to foraging osprey in the summer and for thousands of over-wintering wildfowl and waders.
Coul Links are also protected as part of the Dornoch Firth and Loch Fleet Ramsar site which is designated for its sand dune, saltmarsh and estuary habitats that are of international importance for their flora and geomorphology. SNH has already advised Highland Council that there are likely to be “significant effects on the environment” caused by the championship course while a petition against the project has attracted more than 520 signatures.
A petition in favour has just under 300 signatures.
The area’s business leaders have embraced the prospect of new jobs and an influx of tourists and other golf courses have also welcomed the scheme.
A spokesman for the developers’ agents Jones Lang Lasalle has said: “The applicant is undertaking an environmental assessment of the site and its surroundings with the objective of achieving a development proposal that responds to the environment.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here