SHEEP farmers have raised concerns about proposals to reintroduce the lynx, which became extinct in the UK more than 1,300 years ago.
Last year, the Lynx UK Trust launched a national consultation for farmers and landowners on a trial reintroduction of the cat at several sites in the UK, in Aberdeenshire, Argyll, Northumberland, Cumbria and Norfolk.
A report for the trust suggested the Eurasian lynx’s return in just two areas would deliver net benefits of £68 million over 25 years, boosting eco-tourism, keeping down deer and improving crop yields, wildlife and forestry. And, there would be minimal negative impacts on farming, as lynx prefer to hunt deer rather than livestock or domestic pets, the report claimed.
But a report by the National Sheep Association (NSA) raised concerns that the introduction of the predator would jeopardise the “already fragile state” of the sheep farming industry.
Lynx are unpredictable in their hunting and while there was likely to be low levels of sheep kills by lynx in areas where deer numbers were high, any premature death of livestock was unacceptable to farmers, the organisation said.
The cats could also kill more sheep than they needed to feed themselves, and the impact of their presence could pose a welfare issue to the livestock, it added.
Phil Stocker, NSA chief executive, pointed to the similarities between the threat the lynx would pose to sheep and lambs and the issue of dog attacks on the animals.
“Attacks by dog cause sheep to miscarry their unborn lambs, to be separated from baby lambs once they are born, and to fail to thrive due to high levels of stress. It would be the same with the lynx.”
He added: “Poorer animal welfare is just one of many problems lynx would create if they were introduced.
“Decision-makers must consider this, along with other, wider consequences and seriously consider the detail, not just be taken in by the general appeal of having a big cat in our countryside.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here