NEARLY 1.5 million homes in Scotland are classed as “unhealthily cold” and households with low energy efficiency bands are more likely to be living in fuel poverty, new figures reveal.
Campaigners from Existing Homes Alliance, whose members include environmental charities WWF Scotland and Changeworks, compiled the figures – showing 62 per cent of Scots were living in cold houses – and called on politicians to get rid of the “scourge” by 2025.
Guidance from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice) recommends properties are at least Energy Performance Certificate band C, and ideally band B, to reduce the risk of death and ill-health associated with living in a cold home.
Existing Homes Alliance chairman Alan Ferguson said: “These figures show that if the next Scottish government set an objective to bring all homes in Scotland to at least a C energy performance standard by 2025, they could end the scourge of cold homes currently affecting thousands of households in every single parliamentary constituency.
“Not only did more than 50 business and civil society organisations welcome the cross-party commitment to making improved energy efficiency for Scotland’s homes a National Infrastructure Priority, but the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence suggested a ‘C’ standard is the minimum energy efficiency level to avoid the risk of death and ill-health associated with cold homes.”
More than 75 per cent of households are estimated to be living in a cold home in the constituencies of Western Isles, Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, Caithness, Sutherland and Ross, Shetland, Orkney, Argyll and Bute, and the Banffshire and Buchan Coast.
Just three constituencies had more than half of homes with an “acceptable” energy rating of EPC band C or higher – Glasgow Shettleston, Edinburgh Northern and Leith, and Glasgow Anniesland.
Dr Sam Gardner, head of policy at WWF Scotland, said: “Heating Scotland’s buildings accounts for more than half of our climate change emissions.
“Ensuring every home reaches a C energy performance standard by 2025 is the minimum level of ambition required to allow our climate change targets to be met. A political commitment that no-one should live in a hard-to-heat, draughty home would be good for millions of households, and would drastically reduce emissions too.”
Wilson Shaw, chairman of the National Insulation Association (NIA) in Scotland, said a commitment from the next Scottish government to ensure all homes in Scotland reach a minimum energy efficiency standard could create up to 9,000 jobs a year.
He added: “Today’s figures show that such a commitment would benefit thousands of households across every single Scottish parliamentary constituency. Few other capital investments could make such a difference, and such a commitment would give the energy efficiency industry the confidence to invest for the longer term.”
Patrick Harvie, economy and energy spokesman for the Scottish Greens and MSP candidate for Glasgow, said the figures were a “stark reminder” of the scale of fuel poverty.
“Scottish Greens successfully persuaded SNP ministers to make energy efficient housing a National Infrastructure Priority, but we have yet to see the follow-through on the investment required. Indeed, in the last budget, the SNP cut investment in fuel poverty measures.”
Promising “bolder action” if more Green MSPs are elected, he added: “Scotland can end the scandal of cold homes, and create thousands of local jobs in the construction, heating and insulation sectors.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here