HOMELESS groups are calling on the Scottish Government to scrap plans for a six-month initial tenancy period for private landlords over fears it could force victims of domestic violence to stay in abusive relationships.
Homeless Action Scotland has asked for an amendment to the Private Housing (Tenancies) Bill, set to go before Parliament next week for more detailed scrutiny, to allow “early termination of a tenancy” for those trapped in abusive relationships.
The group’s CEO, Robert Aldridge, said: “This six-month period could make it more difficult for women to leave abusive relationships because they can’t afford to pay the remainder of the rent if [they] left, plus a deposit on another flat.
“I hope there will be an amendment to allow early termination of a tenancy in the context of an abusive relationship and they will accept a one-month initial tenancy period if people need to get out quickly.”
Scottish Women’s Aid’s chief executive, Dr Marsha Scott, welcomed a move to increase tenant's rights but urged the Scottish Government to consider the impact the lengthy tenancy period could have on women who experience domestic abuse.
She said: “Housing is a particularly critical area because so many women are made homeless every year as a direct result of domestic abuse.
“We support the increase in rights of tenants in the private housing sector. It is vital that women and children who are made homeless are able to have long-term security when they are housed in the private sector.
“Where women are forced to leave their private tenancy and become homeless as a result of domestic abuse, we would expect discretion to be used and discretionary housing benefit to be available.
“Ultimately, however, we want the Scottish Government to prevent women and children becoming homeless as a result of domestic abuse.
“They should not have to flee domestic abuse and leave their homes, and current housing options and processes need to be reviewed as a matter of urgency to address the issue of women and children’s enforced homelessness as the result of domestic abuse.”
Emma Saunders, of the Living Rent campaign, also said that the group harboured doubts over the initial rent term proposal.
She explained: “We are concerned that making tenants stay for a minimum of six months could have a disproportionately negative impact on women and children, for whom it may add to the financial burden of leaving an abusive home.
“The new tenancy type proposed by the Scottish Government contains a number of protections for tenants, however, it is important to make sure this legislation doesn’t inadvertently force people to stay in dangerous or difficult living situations.”
Central Scotland SNP MSP Clare Adamson has expressed concerns that the six-month initial tenancy period might work against those who are fleeing domestic abuse.
She said: “Being liable for a six-month period may put financial pressure on someone to remain in a home where they are at risk.”
The Scottish Government insisted that the Housing Minister, Margaret Burgess, will take all the views into consideration during the stages of the Bill.
A spokesperson for the Scottish Government declared: “The Minister has expressed at all times that she is listening to stakeholder views as the Bill proceeds through parliament.”
The spokesperson added: “She agrees people should not be inadvertently forced to stay in dangerous or difficult situations, and welcomes the campaigns’ support for the protection to tenants this bill proposes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here