INTERNET giant Google is using Scotland's growing Yes movement to teach users about the English language, it has emerged.
The search engine, which is one of the world's number one brands, is known for knowing everything.
Now it is using an example from contemporary Scottish politics to help users get a grip on language.
Anyone typing the word "subsequently" into the search engine is informed that the adverb means "after a particular thing has happened; afterwards."
Using the word in context, the answer continues: "many of the Scots who voted for Union subsequently changed their minds", presumably after The Vow was delivered.
According to polls, support for independence has risen since the historic 2014 vote, up from 45 per cent at the ballot box to 48 per cent earlier this year.
Meanwhile, the SNP has grown to around 120,000 members, the Greens now have 9,000 members and two new Yes parties have been formed - Rise and the Scottish Libertarian Party.
Pollsters suggest the Holyrood elections next year will lead to further electoral gains for Yes parties, with the SNP winning a historic third term as Labour and the LibDems continue to haemorrhage votes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here