PLANS for new legislation which would require public bodies, including councils, to promote the use of British Sign Language in order to improve deaf people’s access to services, have been backed by MSPs
Members of Holyrood’s education and culture committee yesterday called for the Scottish Parliament to support the bill when it is debated in Holyrood next Tuesday.
“We acknowledge the strong support for the bill from the BSL community and its recognition that the bill is a stepping stone in a long-term project. However, the legislation has the aim of heightening the profile of BSL and increasing its use in the delivery of services, and ultimately, to lead to better outcomes for BSL users in Scotland,” said the committee’s report.
“We consider the bill is an important step in helping to meet the linguistic needs of BSL users, in the same way as previous legislation did for the Gaelic language in Scotland.”
It added: “We hope the legislation will complement the existing equality legislation, and fully expect public authorities to continue their efforts in meeting their public sector equality duty.”
The bill, introduced by Labour MSP Mark Griffin last year, also suggests introducing a performance review, which would allow the Scottish Government to measure progress being made by public bodies as well as a proposal to name and shame organisations that perform poorly.
Members of the committee engaged with BSL users throughout their consideration of the bill, setting up a Facebook group, which allowed BSL users to submit their views via video clip. Key documents were also made available in BSL and evidence sessions were broadcast with live English/BSL interpretation.
The number of people in Scotland whose first or preferred language is BSL was estimated by the Scottish Executive to be around 6,000.
Ministers have already backed Griffin’s proposals and have estimated the measures, such as providing more BSL interpreters, would cost public bodies between £2.4m and £3.6m between 2016 and 2020.
Research commissioned by the Scottish Government in 2009 found deaf people faced major problems in accessing public services.
It also revealed that deaf pupils had significantly lower school attainment than their hearing peers, and there was limited understanding of the needs of BSL users amongst many public bodies.
It also found very few professionals who can communicate in BSL and a shortage of registered interpreters.
Figures from the Scottish Association of Sign Language Interpreters show Scotland’s entire deaf population has to rely on the services of 80 dedicated sign-language interpreters.
Last year the British Deaf Association in Scotland warned many crimes against deaf people were going unreported, often because of communication problems and a lack of provision of an interpreting service from the police.
If Holyrood backs the bill next week it will return to the education and culture committee for detailed examination and for amendments to be made.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here