A CHANGE is going to come. That was central hook of Theresa May’s speech at the Conservative Party Conference. The Prime Minister channelled the 50-year-old Sam Cooke song, trying to draw an ill-judged parallel between the black American civil rights protesters of the 1960s to the “quiet revolution” of this year’s Leave voters.
May was right in one respect, though. We are at a key moment in the history of the United Kingdom. More so than in many other years, the decisions taken by our leaders will have significant consequences for us.
And the choice for voters in Scotland has never been so obvious.
Theresa May makes Tory party conference pitch to Labour and Ukip’s working-class voters
Reaction: May’s speech shows ‘just how vindictive and xenophobic the Tories are’
Analysis: Theresa May's Tory party conference a speech mix of Milibandism and Michael Howard
Brexit will put 80,000 Scottish jobs at risk and cut wages by seven per cent, says report
Labour are effectively dead as a governing party. Presumably for a generation. Polls say they’ll be wiped out at the next election, a mixture of bitter infighting, Jeremy Corbyn’s incompetence and increasing irrelevance as they look set to spend the next three years talking mostly about themselves. They’ve probably got decades of infighting and bitter recriminations left in them.
This week it has become abundantly clear that the Tories are set on a course that Scotland rejects. One disgusting proposal is to kick out foreign doctors who have spent years working in the NHS because they want someone local to take the job. Another proposal, just as vile, is to make companies publicly declare foreign workers, so people can know how British they are. And are Labour opposing this? They say mostly nothing. One release even criticised the Tories for missing migration targets. Kezia Dugdale, to her credit, distanced herself from it.
Earlier in the week, David Mundell told conference that his party had made the Scottish Parliament one of the most powerful devolved assemblies in the world. And yet, if the last two weeks have taught us anything, it is that Holyrood, in many areas, is effectively impotent. But it needn’t be.
Our politics is different up here. Ruth Davidson and Dugdale are likely more in tune with Nicola Sturgeon on immigration than they are with May and Corbyn.
We are being dragged out of the EU, facing the real possibility of as many as 80,000 jobs being lost.
Surely even the staunchest No voter must look at the choice ahead of them? This isn’t about blood and soil politics. It’s about the pragmatic choice of what you want the future of your country to be.
There is every chance Scotland could soon face a choice between being an independent country in the single market, which welcomes migrants and has strong trading links across the border, or part of an isolationist, divisive, nationalist UK, where the colour of your passport is more important than the colour of your skin.
We know which we’d choose.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here