BLOGGER Kirsty Strickland, who has been awarded a bursary by the Write to End Violence Against Women 2015 campaign, writes her second article for The National today analysing how women are portrayed in the media.
The 25-year-old campaigning mum, from Cambuslang, Lanarkshire, won the chance to have her articles published the The National, media partner for the awards for excellence is journalism, which is organised by Zero Tolerance with the support of NUJ Scotland, White Ribbon Scotland, Scottish Women’s Aid, Engender, Everyday Victim Blaming, Women 50:50, Rape Crisis Scotland, Women for Independence and former MSP Carolyn Leckie.
REEVA Steenkamp was shot and killed by her partner Oscar Pistorius on February 14, 2014. It was Valentine’s Day, and also the day women danced in the streets for the One Billion Rising campaign to end violence against women. The day after she was killed, The Sun newspaper ran a now infamous front page. Reeva’s swimsuit clad image, staring out to the reader, juxtaposed with the headline: 3 shots. Screams. Silence. 3 more shots.
Reaction to the cover was as swift as it was furious. Columnist Suzanne Moore said it was “lechery over a corpse” while former deputy prime minister John Prescott called for a boycott of the paper. People were concerned about what some called the “rebranding of domestic violence as entertainment”.
This retelling of violence as click-bait or tabloid-fodder isn’t only a feature of high-profile cases like Reeva’s, however.
You may have read about Maria Nemeth last week. She was found dead in her apartment in Florida. Her boyfriend Fidel Lopez, 24, phoned the emergency services, stating his girlfriend was having trouble breathing. When they arrived they found Maria, 31, on the bathroom floor mutilated. Her injuries were extensive and savage. She had been assaulted with various objects and pronounced dead at the scene. Afterwards, Lopez admitted he had ‘flew into a rage’ and ‘became a monster’. He told how he assaulted Nemeth while she was unconscious before disembowelling her. He claimed the catalyst for his violence was Maria said her ex’s name while she and Lopez were having sex.
That detail is what made the headlines. It was picked up on and repeated. The Metro went with “Man ripped out girlfriends’ intestines because she screamed ex’s name during sex” . The Sun meanwhile, got straight to what it thought was the point with “Killed for calling out ex’s name during sex”.
You see the effect emphasising details like that have when reading through the comments. Many express sympathy, but for others headline detail is what needs to be discussed. “She said another guy’s name? That’s enough to set anyone off”, “She won’t be making that mistake again” .
Typical of the internet? Perhaps. But it’s a product of a culture that seeks to excuse certain violence if there is the merest suggestion the victim had stepped out of line. Pick your crime – murder, rape, domestic abuse – and then look for the oft repeated get-out clauses. She was drunk. She was frigid. She didn’t pay him attention. She nagged.
The tabloidisation of violent crime is toxic. It’s what drives editors to put a bikini shot of a dead woman on its front page while her body lies cold in a morgue. It’s the one-upmanship of gore, who prints the most graphic pictures, the bloodiest details.
The implements used to violate Maria Nemeth weren’t just mentioned, they were emboldened. The state of her body was described, her many injuries recounted. In all of this detail, all of the brutality and out-of-context violence, nothing makes sense. It’s put in the box marked ‘mindless acts of violence’ and we all move on.
This means the scale of the problem of violence against women goes unchecked. Good reporting should join up the dots in terms of gender-based violence and its social consequences.
Is gore and unfiltered death really what readers want? Maybe. But if our appetite for ever-more violent descriptions and imagery is what is fuelling this race to the bottom then that’s surely a trend we need to buck. There will be more Marias, more Reevas. In the US the chances of a woman facing violence by an intimate or ex-partner are one in three. Across the UK two women a week are killed by a partner or ex.
In December the Write to End Violence Against Women Awards will be held at the Scottish Parliament. The awards and campaign will celebrate journalists, bloggers and writers who seek to report violence against women in a more responsible way.
Through recognising and rewarding that higher standard of writing the hope is other reporters will be encouraged to do better and take more care.
You can get involved by nominating journalists and bloggers who are getting it right and those who deserve the Wooden Spoon Award. The deadline for nominations is October 31. Go to writetoendvaw.com and tweet using #WriteToEndVAW.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here