JEREMY CORBYN faces a media war of attrition. Sadly, I think he’ll lose.
Yesterday another independence referendum anniversary slipped by: September 13 was when thousands of Yes supporters converged on the BBC to protest against its media coverage.
I think this was a significant, if not an especially glorious, moment in Scottish history. It represented the frustrations of hopeful people. For several years – if not longer – they had poured enthusiasm and resources into the cause of a better country and world.
In the media, which in the final weeks of that campaign amplified fears of economic chaos, they did not see their experience represented. In the case of a Corbyn-led Labour party we have a case of history repeating, and I fear his supporters are completely unprepared for the campaign of fear and misrepresentation that is already under way.
Alex Salmond has a fairly strong grasp of the campaign. It was how people accessed information, he contested, that heavily influenced their world view during the referendum.
Traditional media sources learned towards a No vote, while online and social media was dominated by a new generation of writers and bloggers on the Yes side. Smart folk in the Yes campaign understood that the former (print and broadcasting) remains far more influential than the latter.
That’s why SNP and Yes Scotland press teams were dedicated to getting campaign messages out on TV and in the papers – where hundreds of thousands of people gain a perspective on the world. Even leading blogger, Stuart Campbell of Wings Over Scotland, understood the limit of his medium. So he crowd-funded over 300,000 copies of a paper campaign booklet for distribution.
Campaigns must understand that the general public's view is very different from converts or activists. The drip, drip of stories about the economic ‘risks’ of independence or JeremyCorbyn’s ‘threat to national security’ are intended for cautious swing voters. If repeated – in The Mail, Express, Telegraph, Sun, Record and on the BBC – with a limited right of reply then it has the ability to turn an election.
For the Yes campaign this wasn’t fatal. The Sunday Herald backed a Yes vote. There were many pro-Yes commentators. The Sun came close to saying Yes in the final days. And The Herald and others at least gave the campaign a fair hearing.
While a conservative press presented a challenge, it was not unassailable. Today – with The National and a different media landscape – there are no excuses and independence will succeed or fail on the strength of its political and economic arguments.
Corbyn, however, is up against a wall of sound and seems unable to respond to it. Every major newspaper in London is opposed to his leadership. Yesterday he was drawn in a bin on the cover of a major tabloid and chased down the street by Sky News journalists. He’s already been character cast as a anti-semitic, terrorist sympathiser who hates the rich. Yesteday The Telegraph described Corbyn's shadow chancellor as a “nutjob”.
It’s rubbishbollocks. And those attuned to political misinformation and spin will see through it. But that isn’t the target audience.
As one of Corbyn’s few media backers, columnist Owen Jones, has said – this dirt will stick. What English Labour desperately needs is to be on the front foot, discussing policies that are popular such as renationalisation, fairer taxes, support for public services and investment, and an opposition to war.
But what has Corbyn’s media strategy been so far? He ditched a live TV interview with Andrew Marr on Day One. He spent Sunday night ignoring reporters. The announcement of his shadow Cabinet went on until 1am in the morning to avoid the print deadlines and was so poorly orchestrated it was accused of sexism for excluding women (despite eventually being gender balanced!) Worryingly, he thinks social media has transformed the rules of media. It hasn’t, yet.
I hope Corbyn does lead England to revolutionary political change, but I doubt he will. Too many supporters seem intent on making the same mistakes some on the Yes side made – assuming that a massive political movement or social media is enough to win nationwide support.
Without credibility in the place where most people access political information – television and the press – victory is near impossible.
Instead, I can already envisage the crowds gathering outside BBC Broadcasting House in London with 'Tory bias’ signs aloft. They will say, with an element of truth, that their hopes for change were frustrated by the conservative instincts of the media.
A new socialist Labour could yet change that prophecy, but the early signs aren’t great. Despite strong principles, the lack of a media strategy makes Corbyn’s downfall look sadly predictable.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here