WHEN the government ask how they can reduce poverty, how they can get more people into work, and how they can reduce the country’s welfare bill, the answer should be complex.
It is a difficult question requiring a long-term strategy and, perhaps most crucially, a lack of political interference.
“Long-term” in politics means “cross-party”. It means getting politicians around the table, making difficult decisions and agreeing on a policy that will last beyond one or two parliamentary terms.
We have seen this done before in this country and in others. It makes for good policy.
What makes for bad policy is knee-jerk reaction and a fear of the right-wing press.
Kowtowing to what you think are the very worst of your voters’ prejudices does not make you a listening government.
Sanctions are bad policy. They are inhumane.
What sort of person thinks the best way to punish someone for being late or missing an appointment at the Jobcentre is to force them into destitution?
Not only is it bad policy, but it is bad policy implemented incompetently.
New data show that almost half of all sanctions imposed on recipients of Employment Support Allowance and Jobseeker’s Allowance have been overturned on review. It is simply shameful.
What is more shameful is that many of those who have sanctions imposed on them won’t know they can appeal.
The point of sanctions is to encourage the workless to go out and find work. The evidence suggests that they don’t achieve that.
Let us not shy away from the fact that most people who are hurt by sanctions are already vulnerable and disadvantaged. Despite what the poverty porn of Channel 4 and some newspapers would suggest, these are not people claiming thousands while sitting idle.
These are people who have already been failed by society and by government. They are families, often with young children, who are subject to an incompetent bureaucracy instead of help.
Instead of helping them, and instead of trying to find a way to make our society truly equal, the government punish and starve.
It is positively Victorian.
Brown’s big clunking fist misses his target entirely
IT was the return of the great clunking fist. Gordon Brown only now seems to appear if it’s a dramatic last-minute intervention.
This man, a former PM and former Chancellor who is no longer an MP, can still command an audience. Yesterday Sky News and the BBC both broadcast his speech live. You can bet all of the leadership contenders were watching.
Rambling it may have been, and his incessant pacing made it difficult to watch without feeling a little sea-sick, and there was a lot of name dropping, but it was an intelligent and clever speech. What was striking was how wrong Brown got it about why people are backing Corbyn.
Those backing Corbyn want change.
That is why there is much resistance to Corbyn: he represents change. Kendall, Burnham and Cooper represent things as they are.
We are witnessing something unusual in the Labour Party. Who knows how it is going to end?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here