WE all know that dogs are considered man’s best friend. But why exactly is that? This flawed but visually beautiful and ambitious survival adventure seeks to showcase the answer to that very question.
Events take place 20,000 years ago in Europe and focus on a tribe of people doing their best to survive the harsh wilderness. After a hunting expedition goes awry, young Keda (Kodi Smit-McPhee) finds himself injured and isolated from the rest of his tribe, including his tough tribe leader father Tau (Johannes Haukur Johannesson) and caring mother Rho (Natassia Malthe).
He happens across a lone wolf who has been abandoned by its own pack. At first the wolf – which the boy names Alpha – is aggressive towards the human, but Keda finds a way to tame him enough to help him survive and makes his way back home.
It many ways this is a classic story, from its intention as an origin tale of how man came to form a kinship with canines to its straight-forward survival storytelling. It sometimes feels like a Disney adventure, albeit with a slightly harder edge to it.
It works because of the sense of visual splendour and scope that co-writer/director Albert Hughes brings to it. He keeps the dialogue, subtitled in a specially invented prehistoric language, to a bare minimum and instead tells the story mostly through action and unspoken understanding between this boy and his newfound wolf friend.
Thanks to the gorgeous cinematography by Martin Schlacht making the most out of the daunting natural landscapes, scenes that would have otherwise been shot more conventionally – not least a daring underwater rescue – are given an eye- opening majesty that begs to be experienced on the biggest screen possible.
It stops just short of being the intended overwhelming experience, mainly due to hit-or-miss emotional beats that sometimes lose the battle between touching and just corny. But there’s something winning about a film that has an old-fashioned heart, purpose of conviction and a bravura visual style.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here