I READ that Billy Connolly says he is the least patriotic of men. Well, be that as it may. He will know better than me. For having thought carefully about what it means to be Scottish, I have come to one crystal-clear conclusion. In the last analysis the issue is essentially a question of personal identity.
Happily, I have no doubt about my personal identity. It is first and foremost Scottish. If pressed, I should have to admit that legally I am also British. I am, however, aware that some Scots would say that they are primarily British and only then Scottish. I must respect their sense of identity, though for a host of practical reasons I believe them to be terribly mistaken.
From my knowledge of English friends and acquaintances it is also clear that their sense of identity is very different, both from my own and from that of what I call British Scots. In my experience, the English mostly think of themselves as English first and British at a second thought. Not unlike myself, you may say? But the key difference between their sense of identity and my own is that for them English and British are essentially synonymous terms, not alternative identifies.
Given that the English make up roughly 90 percent of the population of Britain it would be strange if they did not feel such a sense of identity. Confused and overbearing at times we may find it. But the fact is that much of the world agrees with them, including of course most of the British media, not least the BBC.
Bringing this confusion of identities into alignment with a new constitutional structure is obviously the strategic objective of Scottish nationalists of every shade. But persuading the British Scots of their fundamental misconception is a major obstacle to achieving that objective. How is it to be done?
It may take events rather than arguments to educate them.
Peter Craigie
Edinburgh
IN reply to WJ Graham’s letter (April 11), debate is always welcome on these matters. With regards to the Bible being akin to a fairy tale, I am aware millions of believers would disagree with me. Richard Dawkins gets death threats from some such people daily.
I have studied the Bible along with numerous other works which differentiate between the Bible and fact. As part of my research I went to Israel. I agree with you that Jesus existed, and that what he represented, however, is most definitely a matter of opinion.
You wrote: “Your reader believes that all wars are caused by religion.” When in fact in my letter of April 3 I wrote: “When are people going to realise that religion is causing a large proportion of trouble in the world, and that it is the cause of most of the wars?” This was to point out that some people’s ideologies/beliefs make them act irrationally by committing atrocities. Islamic terrorism is just one example of this and is in a way a war against innocent individuals.
Anne Smart
Milton of Campsie
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel