I HAVE just finished reading the excellent Common Weal publication A Short Guide to Starting a New Country, in preparation to reading the long version. It sets out an easily digestible template for setting up an independent Scotland.
There are two items in the book which lead me to think that Westminster will do everything that it can not to agree to a second referendum on Scottish independence. In the chapter on defence, the authors say that they expect an independent Scotland would sign, amongst others, the 2017 Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
This would mean that the nuclear weapons in Scotland would have to be immediately made non-operational and then removed from Scottish territory under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency. In the chapter on negotiations, the authors make the point that the UK has nowhere to move its Trident nuclear system to. Given the desperation of Westminster to stay at the international “top table”, I cannot envisage them agreeing to a referendum which would immediately take away their big-power status.
With this in mind, I think all of us who are pro-independence will have to be prepared to take on a referendum without the agreement of the British state. As the UK has no written constitution binding Scotland to the Union, and the 1707 Treaty of Union is the only tangible thing binding Scotland to the Union, then I believe that the Scottish electorate have the right to take a unilateral vote on staying or leaving. Yes then, Yes now, Yes always.
Jon Southerington
Deerness, Orkney
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel