IN the Western world today, lies have replaced truth in service of the plutocracy. The UK Government is actively rubbishing its own Brexit forecasts. The Brexit Minster even went as far as to accuse his own civil servants of being engaged in a conspiracy to undermine Brexit.
The US Government is at war with itself, with sections of the US Congress undermining the FBI investigation into Trump.
Perhaps the most remarkable feature of this nauseating spectacle is the inability of the Westminster and Washington governments to deal seriously with any of the myriad crises engulfing the world economy.
The Tory head-bangers’ post-Brexit plan is a fantasy festival of reaction and political filth. All they have is hate-filled invectives filled with paeans to the empire, and military, fascistic attacks on immigrants, and invocations of religion, royals and the Union flag.
The Brexit process is a hollow ritual, whose essential emptiness is an expression of the crisis and decay of the UK’s position internationally.
In this new Orwellian world, reality itself has become the enemy. If reality contradicts propaganda it must be denied. There is an unspoken strategy by UK Government departments, tax-exempt think tanks funded by the ruling interests, and media acting in behalf of a war and police state agenda, to shape perceived reality as it is described in George Orwell’s book, 1984.
This embarrassing spectacle has even infected Holyrood. Feather-brained Unionist politicians demand things from the SNP government that are then delivered. Those same Unionists then vote against the things they demanded. Even better, they then ask the Holyrood government to deliver things they are not legislatively responsible for.
Alan Hinnrichs
Dundee
SOME 150 years ago my house was built using timbers taken from our colonies, at about the same time that we were at war with the Chinese over their refusal to accept the import of opium from our Indian possessions.
How history flies past us. Now our Prime Minister, while severing our alliances with Continental Europe, engages in trade talks with China and, just possibly, wonders why she does not receive the kow-towing due to Her Majesty’s principal officer of state.
Is it possible that those who believe in the continuity of our union of four equal partner nations might have misunderstood the events of the last century? Might they believe the developing world has time for an offshore island which has wilfully destroyed its strong manufacturing industries, participated in the global financial collapse, and is in the process of isolating itself from one of the world’s most significant markets?
There is time yet to save ourselves from the folly of imperial nostalgia and its associated xenophobia. The sorry spectacle of Teresa May hand-bagging her tawdry goods around markets decent folk might avoid is not what we voted for in 2014, 2015, 2016 or 2017.
It is time now for the parliamentarians elected last May to prove their worth by respecting the elective will of the people of Scotland to stay united with our European friends, with whom we hold ties over many, many centuries. I will not hold my breath, but if they have self-respect rather than seek Westminster laurels they may heed my words.
KM Campbell
Doune
HAVING been a regular reader since the inception of The National it has been great to to see the variety of subjects covered. Many thanks to Greg Russell for his interesting article on the famous Hall Russel shipyard in Aberdeen which closed in 1992 (Hall Russell: Famous Aberdeen yard’s final ship sets sail, The National, January 26). Although the Clyde was most associated with shipbuilding in Scotland, there were many other yards: Dundee, Leith, Burntisland, Troon, Ardrossan, Campbeltown.
John Macleod
Milngavie
WERE we forewarned? A good while ago, in an early Sunday morning news bulletin, BBC Radio 2 announced that the proposed Great Repeal Bill would incorporate EU legislation into English law. Later bulletins were altered, and I thought that it had just been the usual “English equals British” attitude prevalent in London. But now I have to wonder.
Jim Clark
Scone
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here