EMPLOYERS are being accused of undercutting wages by keeping people on agency contracts for years.
A study by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) found that three out of five agency workers are being employed in the same role at the same workplace for more than a year, with one in six in the same role for more than five years.
The TUC said that many of these workers’ employers are deliberately paying them less than their permanent colleagues – a difference of £1.50 an hour on average.
At some workplaces the difference is £4 an hour or £7 for those working anti-social shifts, said the union organisation.
The industries with the highest numbers of long-term agency workers were banking and finance, distribution, hotels and retail and manufacturing, the analysis of the Labour Force Survey discovered.
The report said young workers were particularly at risk of being “trapped” in insecure agency work.
Two-fifths of agency staff employed for more than a year are aged 16-35.
TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady believes bosses are keeping employees on agency contracts to reduce wages.
She said: “Employers are keeping people on agency contracts to drive down wages.
“Two people working next to each other, doing the same job, should get the same wage.
“But bosses are exploiting a loophole in the law that allows them to pay agency workers less.
“The Government must scrap this loophole now – it’s an undercutters’ charter.”
A Business Department spokesman said: “The Government recently set out plans to ensure millions of workers, including agency workers, will benefit from enhanced rights and protections.
“Under the package of proposals, all 1.2 million agency workers will be able to request a more stable contract and receive a clear breakdown of their pay.
“We are also considering repealing laws allowing agencies to employ workers on cheaper rates.”
The TUC was set up in 1868. It briefs member unions on economic, equalities and workplace policy, and on trends in the workplace and economy. It will celebrate its 150th anniversary this year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel