A LEGAL firm that undertakes complex actions on behalf of client groups is planning to take on Clydesdale Bank on behalf of potentially thousands of business customers who bought fixed rate Tailored Business Loans (TBLs) between 2002 and 2012, including those relating to conduct under its trading name Yorkshire Bank and its previous parent company National Australia Bank (NAB).
RGL said it believed that more than 6000 SMEs had legitimate grounds to join the action. Many of those firms that took out TBLs later lost their businesses to insolvency as a result of what RGL said was the fraudulent behaviour of the bank.
The company has received funding to prosecute the litigation from Augusta Ventures, one of the largest and most respected litigation funders in the UK.
RGL said it expected to issue claims this year, with the precise timing dependent on tactical considerations. This meant it could happen very quickly and leave those SMEs with valid claims with little or no time to join. The firm has already recruited a significant number of SME businesses to its group and it has encouraged any business that took out a TBL to contact them at www.sueclydesdale.com.
Given that the funding is already in place, claimants will be able to join the action without making any financial contribution to the costs and without any exposure to an adverse costs order.
James Hayward, RGL’s CEO, said: “Clydesdale’s conduct is actionable and we’ll be suing those involved in order to recover damages for those customers it harmed. Proceedings will probably be issued later this year, however the exact timing is difficult to predict and will depend primarily on what gives us the greatest tactical advantage.” TBLs refer to a brand of more than 11,000 fixed and variable rate loans made to Clydesdale and Yorkshire Bank customers between 2001 and 2012, over 8000 of which were fixed rate TBLs.
These purportedly contained embedded or hidden swaps – sequences of cash flows at least one of which is determined by an uncertain variable. It is claimed these were not disclosed to customers who thought they were entering into a simple fixed rate loan.
The swap or hedging element was similar to that of a standalone interest rate hedging product, in particular, through the purported hedge Clydesdale sought to charge disproportionate and crippling break costs in the event that customers wanted to exit the loan early. RGL said this also had the effect of locking them into higher interest rates and higher bank margins as interest rates fell.
A spokesperson for Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banking Group said: “Whilst we have seen reports of a potential claim being considered in relation to TBLs, we have not received any such claim to date from RGL Management Ltd and it is therefore not possible to comment on speculation around any potential case or the basis for any claim.
“In relation to TBLs, this is a long-standing historical matter which has been subject to significant scrutiny and which the bank has been working through with customers as part of a wide-ranging remediation programme, in an open and transparent manner. We have made significant progress in resolving the vast majority of cases.
“Where we have reached a final agreement with customers, the cost of this has been covered by existing provisions as extensively disclosed in our financial reports.”
In the coming weeks, only subscribers will be able to comment on The National articles. Subscribe now or log in to make sure you stay a part of the conversation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions. What should we do with our second vote in 2021? What happens if Westminster says no to indyref2?
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversation, register under fake names, and post vile abuse. We’ve had hundreds of emails from you complaining about this, asking us to take steps to ensure that these people aren’t given a platform on our site.
We’re listening to you, and here’s how we plan to make that happen.
We have decided to make the ability to comment only available to our 10,000 paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them.
We’ll be monitoring this change over the first few weeks, and we’re keen to know your thoughts. Email us at letters@thenational.scot if you want to have your say.
Callum Baird, Editor of The National