THE firm that ran the Fukushima nuclear plant has apologised for its “cover up” when it delayed disclosure of meltdowns at three reactors.
Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) president Naomi Hirose’s apology followed the revelation last week that an investigation had found his predecessor instructed officials during the 2011 disaster to avoid using the word “meltdown”.
“I would say it was a cover up,” Hirose told a news conference. “It’s extremely regrettable.”
Tepco instead described the reactors’ condition as less serious “core damage” for two months after the earthquake and tsunami on March 11, 2011, wrecked the plant, even though utility officials knew and computer simulations suggested meltdowns had occurred.
An investigative report released last week by three company-appointed lawyers said Tepco’s then-president Masataka Shimizu instructed officials to use the milder description under alleged pressure from the prime minister’s office, though the investigators found no proof.
Former officials at the prime minister’s office have denied the allegation.
Tepco has been accused of softening its language to cover up the seriousness of the disaster, though the investigation found Tepco’s delayed acknowledgement did not break any law.
Hirose said he will take a 10 per cent pay cut, and another executive will take a 30 per cent cut, for one month each to take responsibility.
The report found that Shimizu’s instruction to avoid using the term “meltdown” delayed full disclosure of the plant’s status to the public, even as people who lived near the plant were forced to leave their homes, with some of them permanently unable to return.
Tepco finally used “meltdown” in May, 2011, in its public statements after another computer simulation showed fuel in one reactor had almost entirely melted and fallen to the bottom of the primary containment chamber, and that the two other reactor cores had melted significantly.
The issue surfaced earlier this year in a separate investigation in which Tepco acknowledged that a company manual had been overlooked during the crisis. The acknowledgement reversed its earlier position that it had no internal criteria to guide how it characterised a meltdown to the public.
The report said Tepco officials, who had suggested possible meltdowns, stopped using the description after March 14, 2011, when Shimizu’s instruction was delivered to the company’s vice president at the time, Sakae Muto, in a memo at a televised news conference.
Shimizu had a company official show Muto his memo and tell him the prime minister’s office has banned the specific words.
Government officials also softened their language on the reactor conditions around the same time, the report said.
Then-top government spokesman Yukio Edano, now secretary general of the main opposition Democratic Party, criticised the report as “inadequate”, raising suspicion over the report by the lawyers seen close to the ruling party ahead of an upcoming Upper House election.
Tepco has been accused of a series of cover-ups in the disaster, though the report found that the company’s delayed meltdown acknowledgement was not illegal.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here