US Democrats want to know why the Trump administration allowed two Russian spy chiefs under US and European sanctions to meet American intelligence officials in Washington last week.
Russia’s US ambassador said Sergei Naryshkin, head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, was in the US to discuss counter-terrorism with his American counterparts.
Naryshkin was accompanied at the meeting in Washington by Alexander Bortnikov, who directs the top KGB successor agency known as the Federal Security Service, according to US officials. The two Russian intelligence officials were sanctioned in 2014 in response to Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine – Naryshkin by the US, and Bortnikov by the European Union.
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said the timing of the meeting is suspicious because it came just days before the Trump administration decided not to issue new sanctions against Russian politicians and oligarchs over Russian interference in the election. He released a letter demanding that Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats disclose details of the meeting by February 9.
Schumer said sanctions against Naryshkin impose severe financial penalties and prohibit his entry into the US without a waiver.
The State Department declined to comment, saying visa records are confidential by law.
The CIA would not confirm the meetings, saying only that any interactions with foreign intelligence officials would have been conducted in accordance with US law and in consultation with appropriate departments and agencies. Such meetings might occur more often than is publicly known.
Government agencies at times need to secure waivers to get certain individuals into the country, according to a US official.
The official said law enforcement agencies, for instance, might need a waiver to allow a witness in an arms trafficking case travel to America. Other US agencies might need to speak with officials from an enemy nation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here