THE remains of a man killed at the World Trade Centre on September 11 have been identified nearly 16 years after the terror attacks.
His name was withheld at his family’s request, the New York City medical examiner’s office said.
The announcement marked the first new identification made since March 2015 in the painstaking effort.
The office uses DNA testing and other means to match bone fragments to the 2753 people killed by the hijackers who crashed planes into the trade centre’s twin towers in 2001.
Remains of 1641 victims have been identified so far, meaning 40 per cent of those who died have no remains identified. New, more sensitive DNA technology was used earlier this year and helped make the latest identification after earlier testing produced no results.
As DNA testing advanced, so has the multi-million-dollar effort to connect more than 21,900 pieces of remains to individuals.
Few full bodies were recovered after the giant towers burned and collapsed and the effects of heat, bacteria and chemicals such as jet fuel made it all the more difficult to analyse the remains. Over time, the medical examiner’s office came to use a process that involves pulverising the fragments to extract DNA, then comparing it with the office’s collection of genetic material from victims or their relatives.
Most of the DNA profiles generated belong to previously identified victims.
In some cases, scientists have gone back to the same bone fragment 10 or more times, hoping new technology will provide answers.
The 9/11 attacks killed a total of nearly 3000 people, in New York, at the Pentagon and near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here