A SYRIAN dentistry student who used mobile phone application WhatsApp to conduct surgeries was a finalist at this year’s Aurora Prize for Awakening Humanity, with the ceremony held in Armenia over the weekend.
Muhammad Darwish, 26, had been studying dentistry at a university in Syria away from his home town of Madaya, a mountainous area north-west of capital Damascus.
In 2015, Madaya became a battleground. Darwish returned, determined to help its people, but the doctor who had begun training him left in early 2016.
He was one of only three remaining medics in the besieged town when he had to conduct his first surgery.
It was an improvised operation on a Syrian war victim, and it was made possible by sending social media photos to experienced doctors abroad.
The abdominal surgery took 10 hours as he repeatedly left the room to consult volunteer doctors using WhatsApp photos.
The parents of the victim knew he was untrained, but wanted him to continue anyway.
“That conversation will stay with me forever,” Darwish said.
“To be in a position where you have to let someone without proper training operate on your son, and for me to take up that responsibility of opening up a living, breathing man on the table, it just should not have to happen.”
At every stage he took pictures of what was happening, sent them to his colleagues and awaited a response. Despite everything, the procedure was a success, and the first of many.
For his courage, commitment, and continued impact, Darwish was a finalist for the second Aurora Prize, with the selection committee co-chaired by humanitarian and actor George Clooney.
Madaya remains in difficulty, plagued by famine, and it is claimed that Darwish has been targeted and threatened by Syrian government forces on multiple occasions because of his humanitarian work.
Although working with little training and only a few others doctors, who also lack specialist training, he has always remained committed to his town.
“It was my duty to my home, to my town and its people,” Darwish said.
“These individuals were family, friends, normal people with normal lives, and this war had torn them apart.
“Imagine the raw cry of a child whose own blood is mixed with the tears on his face, and try to do nothing. I couldn’t.”
Darwish was selected as one of five finalists from 550 nominations across 66 countries. He was the only one unable to attend.
The winner of the Aurora Prize was Dr Tom Catena, the only doctor permanently based in Sudan’s conflict-riven Nuba Mountains.
The Catholic missionary physician has been credited with saving thousands of lives, working in the war-ravaged area.
He received a $100,000 grant, and a $1 million fund to donate to organisations of his choice.
This year, unlike last, when he was also nominated, he was able to attend the ceremony, with three replacement doctors sent from Armenia.
Fartuun Adan was the third finalist, a human rights worker based in Mogadishu, Somalia.
In 1996 warlords killed her husband for his peacemaking efforts. Since then, Adan has championed human rights and the rehabilitation of child soldiers across Somalia.
She has also established the first ever rape crisis centre in Mogadishu.
“We are starting to see a cultural shift,” she says.
“The tolerance of the heinous violence against women and girls is diminishing, but slowly.
“It is amazing seeing people who had lost hope become empowered.”
Jamila Afghani from Kabul has encouraged Afghanistan’s imams or religious leaders to engage on women’s rights and is deeply committed to female education.
Over 6000 imams in the deeply conservative south Asian country have participated in gender sensitivity training.
She said: “When you educate a woman, you educate an entire family. Their learnings are shared.”
The other finalist was Dr Denis Mukwege, from the Republic of the Congo, who has helped care for more than 50,000 survivors of sexual violence in a country branded the rape capital of the world.
“We need to say as an international community, rape is not acceptable in conflict. If you win a war by destroying women, you will never be accepted as a leader,” Mukwege explained.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel