A KENYAN court has ruled that the government must not close the world’s largest refugee camp and send more than 200,000 people back to war-torn Somalia.
The decision eases pressure on Somalis who feared the camp would close by the end of May.
Kenya’s internal security minister abused his power by ordering the closure of Dadaab camp, Judge John Mativo said, adding that the minister and other officials had “acted in excess and in abuse of their power, in violation of the rule of law and in contravention of their oaths of office”.
Rights groups Amnesty International, Kituo cha Sheria and the Kenyan National Commission on Human Rights had challenged the government’s order to close the camp.
Kenya’s government quickly said it will appeal against the ruling.
The judge called the order discriminatory, saying it goes against the Kenyan constitution as well as international treaties that protect refugees against being returned to a conflict zone.
President Uhuru Kenyatta’s government has not proved Somalia is safe for the refugees to return, the judge said, also calling the orders to shut down the government’s refugee department “null and void”.
Somalia remains under threat of attacks from homegrown extremist group al-Shabab.
Some Kenyan officials have argued that the sprawling refugee camp near the border with Somalia has been used as a recruiting ground for al-Shabab and a base for launching attacks inside Kenya.
But Kenyan officials have not provided conclusive proof of that.
US President Donald Trump’s temporary ban on travel from seven majority-Muslim countries, including Somalia, had put added pressure on the Dadaab refugees.
Last weekend, about 140 of the Somali refugees who had been on the brink of resettling in the United States were sent back to Dadaab instead.
Said Abuka, a community leader in Nairobi and a refugee for 22 years, said the court ruling would help the Somali refugees.
Newborn babies could not be registered as refugees because of the shutdown of Kenya’s refugee department, he said.
“After months of anxiety because of the camp closure deadline hanging over their heads, increasingly restricted asylum options and the recent US administration suspension of refugee resettlement, the court’s judgment offers Somali refugees a hope that they may still have a choice other than returning to insecure and drought-ridden Somalia,” said Laetitia Bader, Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch.
Amnesty International welcomed the ruling, saying it affirmed Kenya’s legal obligation to protect people who seek safety from harm and persecution.
“Today is a historic day for more than a quarter of a million refugees who were at risk of being forcefully returned to Somalia, where they would have been at serious risk of human rights abuses,” the rights group’s Muthoni Wanyeki said in a statement.
Territory control map of Somalia, also showing Dadaab refugee camp in Kenya Somalia’s UN-backed government, with the help of a 22,000-strong African Union force, is battling Islamist group al-Shabab to regain control of the country.
But it has only managed to secure major towns.
The militants, who impose a strict version of Islam in the areas they control, still mount bombings and have carried out a series of attacks in neighbouring Kenya.
Al-Shabab has carried out several attacks on Kenya, which sent troops to Somalia in 2011 to fight the militants. The attacks include the September 2013 attack on the Westgate mall that killed 67 people and the 2015 attack on Garissa University that killed 148 people, mostly students.
Kenya is currently building a fence along its 700km (435-mile) border with Somalia, but has completed only 4km so far.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here