ALAN Stubbs knows the idea that Hibernian do not have the bottle for success has re-surfaced in recent days – but the head coach is adamant they should be judged at the end of the campaign and not after two shock defeats.
When Stubbs arrived in the summer of 2014, he was made painfully aware of the impression that Hibs were a soft touch.
He spoke only recently of having worked hard to change that perception.
With that in mind, the 3-0 home defeat to Morton last Wednesday, when they had the opportunity to close the gap on Rangers at the top of the Championship to five points, came as a shock.
Saturday’s 3-2 loss to Dumbarton, though, brought back accusations of an inability to survive when the going gets tough.
However, Stubbs mounted a spirited defence of his squad yesterday as he prepared for a crucial league clash with Queen of the South, a game that will be swiftly followed by a Scottish Cup quarter-final against Inverness Caley Thistle and their League Cup final against Ross County.
He said: “If people are saying we have crashed then we must have crashed to get to the League Cup final and we must have crashed to get to the Scottish Cup quarter-final. You can’t have it both ways.
“Since I’ve come here we’ve done okay.
“With everything in life it’s changing the perceptions people have of you. Let’s see if these people are saying the same things at the end of the season.
“It’s the first time we’ve lost back-to-back games since the season started six months ago so we’re still doing okay.”
Not only have Hibs’ consecutive defeats seemingly cost them the opportunity to challenge Rangers for the title, they have also given Falkirk the opportunity to snatch second spot away from the capital men.
Hibs’ lead is now just two points, with 10 games remaining, and both will know the benefits of finishing second and having two fewer matches to play in the play-offs.
However, Stubbs is adamant he and his side are not concerning themselves with Falkirk closing in on them below.
He added: “I’ve not looked over my shoulder, to be honest, since the season started.
“We’re obviously aware of what’s going on. But we just keep doing what we know we can do. The rest doesn’t make any difference.
“There is a long way to go yet... a lot of football to be played.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here