A PUBLIC consultation on the controversial £40 million stadium for Aberdeen FC on the outskirts of the city has been launched.
The Dons’ replacement for Pittodrie would seat 20,000 fans and could feature a new club store, a café, memorial garden and heritage museum charting the club’s history.
A 12-week consultation on the ambitious proposals for a new stadium at Kingsford between Kingswells and Westhill was opened yesterday.
Just last week, a group opposed to Aberdeen FC’s plans faced a torrent of online abuse from some fans but members of the Say No to Kingsford Stadium vowed to continue its campaign.
An incident in which weed killer was sprayed over one campaigner’s garden has also been reported to police.
The group said the incidents would not stop their fight to get the plans thrown out.
Club chiefs insist the stadium and training facilities would be a community focal point offering a range of facilities for locals.
It would have 1,300 parking spaces, three first team training pitches, two community ones and a pavilion for locals that would include offices, changing rooms and a gym.
Members of the No to Kingsford Stadium group have claimed there is no need for the new community facilities, and have also raised fears about the loss of green belt land along the A944 and potential traffic problems.
Aberdeen chief executive Duncan Fraser said: “Our proposal is to develop much-needed modern training facilities, community facilities and a 21st-century stadium that provides an enhanced match-day experience.
“These will support the ambitions of the club, further the significant work already done within the community by Aberdeen FC Community Trust and deliver wider economic and social benefits to the city and region.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here