THE SPFL have an opportunity to substantially increase their income from overseas broadcasting rights following the collapse of their existing arrangement with MP & Silva, it was claimed yesterday.
The governing body have terminated an agreement that was struck back in 2013 after the London-based sports agency defaulted on payments and are currently working to provide international broadcasters with a signal from forthcoming fixtures.
But Professor Richard Haynes of Stirling University, an expert in sports broadcasting rights, questioned whether the company, which has worked with Formula 1, the Premier League and Serie A in the past, ever truly maximised the earning potential of the game in this country.
Professor Haynes believes the SPFL now has an outstanding chance to cash in on the huge numbers of Celtic and Rangers fans who live abroad, in Australia and the United States in particular, and bank millions of pounds for their leading clubs.
“It is unfortunate for the SPFL to be in this position and to have to pull out of the deal,” he said. “I’m sure it wasn’t an easy decision to make. But, at the same time, it opens up opportunities for them to strike deals which will be more lucrative and broaden the reach of Scottish football.
“I don’t think MP & Silva have been selling Scottish football appropriately or as the SPFL might have wanted them to. That’s always a danger with global intermediaries like MP & Silva. They have some very blue chip sports in their portfolio. Scottish football probably came very low down their priorities and list of things they are going to sell to channels around the world.
“Celtic and Rangers have, along with Manchester United and one or two other clubs, the biggest audience out there who want to see their games. Ex-patriots, second and third generation families who have kept their ties and traditions of following these clubs. It is huge, it really is massive. It is definitely a market for TV companies to exploit.
“It is a good opportunity for the SPFL to find a more appropriate intermediary to sell the rights overseas. There are a lot of companies with expertise in this area which they can draw upon.
“There are new players in town; DAZN, Premier, beIN SPORTS. There are a number of dedicated sports distributors and providers who are looking for content to fill their channels. It is a very different landscape from 2013. It has changed quite considerably. Even the likes of Sky and BT are on shaky ground in some areas.
“This is a chance for the SPFL to look at it again. I have always thought that Scottish football has been undersold. It might be an opportunity for them to find a more appropriate vehicle. It might be internet led. For me, that is the direction of travel. A lot of sport is gravitating there. That is how a lot of people view it.”
Professor Haynes continued: “The SPFL have to be clever when it comes to how they market Scottish football going forward for it to be lucrative enough.
“There are a lot of people who feel the product has been good but hasn’t been packaged properly. Even European games. The recent Rangers games are a good example. Fans struggled to find a legitimate source to watch their Europa League qualifiers or had to pay £10 over and above the package they already have. It is the right time to look at it again.
“It is starting to add up – the expense of these different subscriptions. You have the likes of Netflix, Amazon, Apple and You Tube who are also increasingly interested in these type of rights.
“Getting the right intermediary to package what they have got in a way that is sensible and doesn’t upset consumers and make them move more towards pirated feeds is important for the SPFL.”
SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster said: “Scottish football is growing in popularity at home and abroad.
“We are working to ensure that fans across the globe are able to enjoy matches from the Ladbrokes SPFL, the Betfred Cup and the IRN-BRU Cup as normal this season. This also allows us to explore opportunities to give even more fans worldwide the chance to watch our games.
Fans in no fewer than 167 overseas countries watched Ladbrokes SPFL and Betfred Cup matches last season.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here