WALTER SMITH admits the Scotland job was the only one he would have considered coming out of retirement for after turning down the chance to return to Hampden.
The 70-year-old was approached by the Scottish FA last month as they continued their search for Gordon Strachan’s successor following Michael O’Neill’s call to remain with Northern Ireland.
But he ruled himself out of the running before the SFA turned to Alex McLeish and he clinched his return to the national side.
Smith has not been in the dugout since he left Rangers seven years ago and has no regrets over his decision to remain in retirement.
He said: “First and foremost I would like to clarify that I really wasn’t asked to take the job.
“I was asked if I would come out of retirement and in the end I decided not to bother, as you know.
“That meant Alex got the job and he maybe should have had the job in the first place anyway because he has the credentials from his run in charge the last time.
“Yes [I am comfortable with the decision]. I was not looking at the time for a job. I was asked if it was a job I would consider doing.
“But I never got to the stage where I sat down and talked to them any further on that.
"After two or three days of media coverage, to be quite honest, I was ticked off.”
Smith spent three years in charge of Scotland and almost led the nation to the World Cup in 2006 before he returned to Ibrox for a successful second spell at the helm.
He will be back on familiar territory this weekend as he oversees a team of former Light Blues heroes in a charity match.
But there will be no return to full-time management for the Gers legend after a glory-laden career that ensured his place in Scottish football folklore.
Smith said: “The hassle would never bother me. Or I don’t think it would bother me these days, but I don’t know because it’s been a long time since I’ve had a great deal of hassle, except from the missus.
“But it was something where somebody asks you and if you’ve done the job before there are bits of it you miss. Some of it you don’t miss, but there are bits of it you miss.
“So when somebody asks you if you would consider coming out of retirement you think about it.
“You toss it over. I did that for a couple of days and decided not to bother.
“I’m coming out of retirement for the legends game on Saturday for the first time in a while.
“I am categorically finished, done. That was the only one I would have considered.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here