ALEX Salmond has warned the UK Government against further “blatant abuse” of financial statistics during a potential second Scottish independence referendum.
The former First Minister accused ex-UK Europe minister David Lidington of being “up to your neck in Project Fear” during the EU referendum.
The MP for Gordon made the claim as he asked the UK Government to assure MPs that it will “never again” adopt such tactics when handling Treasury figures during any future referendum on Scottish independence.
The Scottish Government has unveiled draft legislation for a second referendum after a majority of voters north of the Border backed the UK remaining in the EU.
Downing Street says the Scottish Government has no mandate for a second referendum after independence was rejected in 2014.
Speaking in the Commons, Salmond told Tory frontbencher Lidington: “Can we have a debate entitled ‘Project Fear’ so that you personally and (former Chancellor George Osborne) in particular can reflect on the wisdom of presenting the case against leaving the European Union as a short-term apocalyptic emergency budgeted disaster, as opposed to concentrating on the medium-term damage that would certainly be done to this through a withdrawal from the European single market place.
“Given that you personally were up to your neck in Project Fear, can you give this House an assurance that never again will there be such a blatant abuse of Treasury statistics and forecasts in any future referendum that might come along?”
Lidington, now the leader of the Commons, replied: “I have to say, though it probably embarrasses you now; you and I were on the same side in the referendum campaign.
“I think to be honest there is little point on us conducting post-mortems into the referendum campaign.
“Whatever the reasons that led people to vote the way they did, the turnout was at or above general election levels and the outcome – although it was a narrow margin – was decisive and clear and is respected not just by parties in this House, but by the other 27 governments within the EU.
Lidington added: “We now have to get on with the task of negotiating the best possible deal for British citizens and British business in these new circumstances.”
SNP Commons leader Pete Wishart also teased Mr Lidington about an online petition calling for Scotland to be kicked out of the UK.
He said: “It’s come to my attention there’s a petition kicking around just now, which is asking this House to have a debate and organise a process to kick Scotland out of the union.
“Now, I’m thinking what could possibly go wrong with such a petition?
“Imagine the prospect if that got into the hands of somebody who wanted to make mischief of this or one of my honourable friends managed to secure a debate on this issue if it got to 100,000 signatures?”
He sarcastically added to Mr Lidington: “Will you join me in appealing to the good people of this nation to ‘Do not sign this petition’ and ensure this disaster does not come to pass?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here