THE Scottish Greens have robustly defended their position on full fiscal autonomy after Caroline Lucas, the Green MP for Brighton, was criticised for voting against the SNP amendment during a debate on the Scotland Bill.
Patrick Harvie, Scottish Green MSP for Glasgow, said it made no sense for Scotland to have control of fiscal policy without control of monetary policy.
“The Scottish Greens backed independence to give Scotland a chance to change economic direction, a position respected and supported by colleagues such as Caroline Lucas,” he said. “We still support that. But neither a currency union, which we opposed during the referendum, nor a headlong rush toward a poorly designed scheme labelled full fiscal autonomy will achieve that.
“Instead, without control of macroeconomic policy we would remain locked in to decisions made by the UK Government. Either proposal looks superficially like handing Scotland more power but in reality would mean tying our hands behind our backs.”
Harvie, who outlined his party’s position on full fiscal autonomy last Friday in his regular column for the National, continued: “Fiscal autonomy must come with the ability to run a radically different economy policy. We’d also need to be able to build up reserves, and determine borrowing without reference to the UK Government. We have yet to see such a scheme proposed. Even if it was, there would still be severe limits to fiscal policy if we have no control of monetary policy.”
On Monday night, Lucas voted against the amendment to the Scotland Bill that would have seen full fiscal autonomy delivered to Holyrood to “reflect the view” of her colleagues in Scotland. The amendment was defeated by 508 votes to 54.
Responding to Harvie’s comments a spokesperson for the SNP said: “Fifty-six of Scotland’s 59 MPs believe that Scotland should be moving towards full fiscal autonomy – so that the levers over the economy and welfare are in Scotland’s hands.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here