GEORGE Osborne repeatedly refused to apologise over the attempt to introduce £1.3 billion a year cuts in disability benefits as he insisted the cost of abandoning the policy could be absorbed because public spending was under control.
The Chancellor admitted the now-shelved cuts had been a “mistake” and insisted he had listened to and learned from concerns about the changes to the personal independence payment (PIP).
But he stressed that the public finances had to be brought under control to protect people who would be “crushed” by a collapsing economy.
Osborne defended his record as he responded to Iain Duncan Smith’s explosive resignation from the Cabinet over the cuts to the welfare budget.
Taking the unusual step of opening the final day of Commons debate on the Budget, Osborne insisted that he was part of a “compassionate, One Nation Conservative government determined to deliver social justice and economic security”.
And he repeated his mantra that “we are all in this together” – a claim challenged by Duncan Smith in his resignation letter.
Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell called for Osborne to quit and said his behaviour “calls into question his fitness for the office he now holds” or, in a reference to the prospect of a future Tory leadership battle, “any leading office in government”.
Osborne was challenged by a series of MPs to say sorry to the disabled people who feared losing out as a result of the now-ditched plans to cut PIPs.
Former Shadow Chancellor Chris Leslie told him: “You have made a welcome U-turn, but shouldn’t you now acknowledge that was a mistake that you should say sorry for?”
Osborne replied: “I have made it clear that where we’ve made a mistake, where we’ve got things wrong, we listen and we learn.
“That’s precisely what we’ve done.”
Former work and pensions secretary Duncan Smith stormed out of the Government on Friday, complaining that he was again being forced to make cuts to the most vulnerable while Osborne was handing tax cuts to the better-off, which risked dividing the country.
Osborne acknowledged the pair had argued over Treasury cuts to welfare spending in the past.
But he but praised the former Work and Pensions Secretary for being part of the team which has delivered a “fairer society for all”.
The reforms to PIPs had been due to save a total £4.4 billion from the welfare budget by 2020.
The Government has ruled out a further raid on welfare to pay for the cost of the U-turn and Osborne insisted that the public finances could “absorb” the lost savings.
Osborne said: “These are the changes you can afford to absorb when you are getting public spending under control.
“So we can make these changes and still achieve a sensible surplus of half a percent of GDP by 2019/20. In short we go on delivering the economic security that this country elected us to provide.”
The head of the Officer for Budget Responsibility, Robert Chote, said that following the decision to cancel the PIP cuts, the Government was now set to exceed its own welfare cap by £4 billion a year.
“Taking into account the loss of the money from PIP, you breach by about £4 billion in most years.
“It bobs up and down, but it is essentially £4 billion a year,” he told the Commons Treasury Committee.
Osborne said the extra £1.3 billion a year spent on disability benefits by the end of the decade “will be an important factor but only one of many” that will affect the overall forecast for welfare spending that the OBR will make in the autumn.
He added: “At that point we will assess the level of the cap”.
Addressing some of the criticisms levelled at him by Duncan Smith the Chancellor insisted he was committed to social justice – but that could only be achieved if the deficit was under control.
“There is not some inherent conflict between delivering social justice and the savings required to deliver sound public finances. They are one and the same thing,” he said.
“Without sound public finances there is no social justice.”
Osborne said the poorest and most vulnerable would pay the price if he failed to create a stable economy.
“These are the people that I am fighting for, real decent hard-working people, not numbers on a Treasury spreadsheet but people whose lives would be impoverished, whose hopes and aspirations would be crushed if we had gone on spending more and more than the country earned,” he said.
“Getting things right for these people is what I’m all about and it weighs on every decision I have taken as Chancellor over the last six years.
“These are the people that we in this party have been elected to serve.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here