FORMER Liberal Democrat minister Danny Alexander was yesterday accused of appearing to “lean” on the independent finances watchdog after MPs found several “concerning” requests to change economic forecasts.

The Treasury Select Committee believes some of the Treasury’s suggestions to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) which aimed to alter the economic and fiscal outlook were “inappropriate” as they “strayed beyond the factual” in December 2014.

Evidence showing Alexander, the then chief secretary to the Treasury, made two requests for changes which the report said were “particularly concerning”.

Early sight by the Treasury of the OBR’s work is intended to ensure facts are correct.

But Conservative Andrew Tyrie, the Treasury Select Committee chairman, said it was clear Alexander made requests for non-factual changes to the economic and fiscal outlook. He said: “This looks like a misjudgment. It gives the appearance of a minister trying to lean on the OBR. The OBR’s independence is hard-earned and easily squandered.

“Little or no damage appears to have been done in this case, but this shouldn’t be repeated. The Treasury Committee will do what it can to prevent any further such episodes.”

The criticism emerged after MPs analysed email exchanges between OBR and Treasury officials, prompted by a report in the Times which suggested the Government department had tried to interfere with OBR forecasts.

Tyrie said a revised memorandum of understanding is needed to make “crystal clear” the reasons for early sight of the OBR’s work.

He adding: “Any requests or comments which could be construed as going beyond this should be brought to the attention of the chairman immediately and, if necessary, the chairman of the (Budget Responsibility Committee).”

The committee’s report concluded: “A number of Treasury requests for non-factual changes appear to have been taken on board by the OBR. This is unacceptable.

“The removal of words such as ‘topslice’ to describe spending cuts, and ‘complicated’ to describe the then Government’s fiscal assumption, cannot be held to have improved the clarity of the economic and fiscal outlook, nor did they make it more factually accurate. Nonetheless, the committee is satisfied that, on this occasion, the changes the OBR made in response to Treasury requests made no material difference to the analysis contained in the final document.”

A Treasury spokesman said: “In establishing the OBR in 2010, independence and transparency was introduced to economic and fiscal forecasting process for the first time ever, with clear safeguards established to make sure this is protected.

“Officials and ministers have acted entirely properly, respecting that independence, at all times.”

The MPs also examined a review of the OBR by Sir David Ramsden, the chief economic adviser to the Treasury, which the Government labelled independent.

They noted Sir David was “manifestly professionally incapable” of conducting an independent review as he is a “reliable, highly competent and loyal” Treasury official, reports to Chancellor George Osborne, is bound by the civil service code and has a duty to support Government policy of the day.

The select committee report noted: “It would have been difficult for Sir David to have reached conclusions that differed substantially from those of ministers.

“The fact that the Government accepted his recommendations on the day his review was published, in full and without comment, suggests that he may not have attempted to do so.”