AN SNP minister says Westminster has snubbed Scotland in key European Union fisheries talks due to take place in Brussels today.
Rural affairs secretary Richard Lochhead said Scotland had been stopped from having a direct voice at the talks – despite the Smith Commission pledge Scotland should lead when it has the “predominant policy interest”, and even though the UK minister for the marine environment, George Eustice, was unable to attend.
Lochhead had demanded Scotland lead for the UK in the talks at the EU’s Agriculture and Fisheries Council.
However, in a letter to the minister, the UK Government has confirmed an unelected Tory peer with no involvement with fisheries – Lord Rupert Ponsonby de Mauley – will lead for the UK.
The council is due to consider the Baltic Multi-annual Plan which has been described as “critical” for Scotland’s future fishing interests.
It is likely to establish legal and technical precedents which could carry over into the related North Sea Multi-annual Plan which, in turn, would underpin the long-term management of a number of North Sea key stocks in which Scotland has the dominant interest.
The SNP sees the move as breaching the terms of the Smith Commission agreement, which stated a presumption “a devolved administration minister can speak on behalf of the UK at a meeting of the Council of Ministers according to an agreed UK negotiating line where the devolved administration minister holds the predominant policy interest across the UK and where the relevant lead UK government minister is unable to attend all or part of a meeting”.
Last year, following pressure from the then First Minister Alex Salmond, the Prime Minister agreed to overrule a decision that would have seen Scotland’s fisheries interests represented by a junior farming minister.
Lochhead said: “This is a massive Tory snub to Scotland.
“It is disgraceful that the interests of our fishing fleet are being represented by an unelected Tory peer who has no involvement with the industry, especially as its clear Lord Rupert Ponsonby de Mauley has been drafted in so the UK fisheries ministers can go off electioneering.”
He added: “The confirmation that a peer with no involvement in fisheries is to lead these talks exposes the Tories’ real attitude to Scotland – it makes a mockery of the so-called respect agenda and previous agreements that the Scottish government is able to lead on the area of fisheries policy.”
In his November letter to David Cameron, Salmond wrote: “In 2010 both you and the foreign secretary agreed that it is reasonable, given Scotland’s overwhelming interests in fisheries, that Scottish ministers could speak for the UK delegation.
“The memorandum of understanding agreed between our governments in 2013 also makes provision for Scottish ministers to lead discussions in the council where an issue is of greater relevance to Scotland than the UK as a whole.
“It is true that the agreement you made has been breached by your ministers more often than it has been honoured. This is an opportunity for you to see that it is fulfilled and to demonstrate the commitment to the UK as a partnership of nations that you set out during the closing stages of the referendum campaign.”
Lord de Mauley is parliamentary under secretary for natural environment and science and is responsible for the business of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in the Lords.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here