AS members of the Labour Party await the outcome of its leadership election, a poll has confirmed what most people already suspected – voters deserted the party at the May election because they thought Ed Miliband would not be a good prime minister.
Tory peer Lord Ashcroft based his Project Red Alert on polling and focus groups among loyalists – who voted Labour in 2010 and 2015 – and defectors who switched to other parties. It followed research five years ago to find out why people in the movement thought they had lost in 2010, and what should be done about it.
Ashcroft said they believed then “people had failed to appreciate what Labour had achieved, that swing voters had been influenced by the right-wing media, and although Labour’s policies had been right, they had not been communicated well”.
“Accordingly, they expected the Coalition Government to prove so dreadful that people would soon see the error of their ways – Labour would not need to make any big changes in order to win the following election,” he said. “The question for the new leader, whose identity we will know on Saturday, is not just how the party can start winning again, but whether Labour as we know it will survive.”
Ashcroft said he examined the views of Labour loyalists and defectors and found that few in the former group had voted with any enthusiasm.
The majority of all defectors said Miliband had helped push them to another party. Those who joined the Tories were more likely to say they had been put off by the impression that Labour were not ready to form a competent government. This group was also more likely to say they struggled with their decision: nearly a fifth said they found it “very difficult indeed”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here