STAN Grodynski (Letters, Mar 25) would prefer that I “condemn the UK Government” than comment on “perceived SNP shortcomings”. I have been condemning the UK Government for the past 50 years but they just don’t seem to be listening! I live more in hope than expectation that the SNP might still be listening.
Local government and both the Scottish and UK governments are run by political parties. These parties implement policies – or in many cases sadly fail to. Independence for Scotland will be won or lost mainly on the policies of the SNP, by it winning the hearts and minds of voters. It has been that way especially since the creation of the Scottish Parliament back in 1999. Simply haudin yer wheesht and hoping for independence will not work.
READ MORE: Scotland has lost its confidence. Here's how we can help get it back
We will not gain independence by simply pointing to the ills of our southern neighbours and the actions of their government. The actions of Humza Yousaf, the SNP and the Scottish Government now dictate when and if Scotland sees independence. The voters I still speak to on a regular basis do not want to hear too much about the council tax in Birmingham – they don’t live in Birmingham. There is little point in either Mr Grodynski or I spending the rest of our lives individually “building a case with undecided voters” when our own government is attacking the very foundations of that case on a daily basis.
The letter by Glenda Burns that followed Mr Grodynski’s was a perfect illustration of the problems that we face. The procurement failures of the CalMac ferries have cost both financially and politically. The Scottish public see a failure to make the best use of what finances we have been granted by the UK Parliament and they now increasingly begin to wonder if a fully independent Scottish Government can be trusted to control the considerable wealth of our nation.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak takes issue with Joanna Cherry's questions in Westminster grilling
I suspect that most of Scotland’s electorate already accept that we are getting a less than fair financial deal from Westminster (despite what the GERS figures suggest). We cannot expect to take Scotland forward to independence when the existing devolved parliament we have been granted by the UK makes decisions that many undecided voters find bizarre. For example, the bargain sale of the ScotWind leases, the long-term failure to replace the council tax, the ferry fiasco, hate crime legislation, gender recognition, the failure to support the Grangemouth refinery and yes – the introduction of freeports.
The coming General Election will decide the future of Scottish politics the next few years, at least until the Scottish Parliament elections in 2026. The loss of those elections by the current Green/SNP government would see independence off the political agenda for a long time. The clock is ticking but when does the alarm go off?
Brian Lawson
Paisley
“TIME after time Scotland has been exploited and taken for granted by this broken Westminster system that then leaves Scots to pick up the tab for chronic underinvestment and Westminster’s obsession with nuclear,” says Dave Doogan (Outrage as households to be charged extra to help energy suppliers recover debt, thenational.scot, Mar 26). Doogan is absolutely correct. But, astonishingly, he then adds, “Westminster has ignored Scotland for too long, showing why a strong SNP voice is necessary to ensure our values and our needs are advanced.” How illogical can someone be?! What is wrong with these pro-indy MPs that they can’t see the obvious?! It matters not one jot how strong or weak their collective voice is in the cesspit; they will always be outnumbered and be treated with contempt as a result.
Sanny Martin
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel