THE Scottish Tories were slammed as Theresa May’s “poodles” by the SNP in a debate in the Commons yesterday.
Scottish Secretary David Mundell was also repeatedly asked to name one power that would return to Holyrood as a result of Brexit. The Tory frontbencher, who once claimed leaving the EU would lead to a powers “bonanza” for the Scottish Parliament, dismissed the call and talks of a “naked power grab” as “pantomime”.
During the “devolution day” of debate on the EU Withdrawal Bill, Mundell’s backbenchers performed a very soft rebellion. While they didn’t vote against the government and refused to back Labour or SNP amendments to the motion, they told ministers that the controversial Clause 11, which sees powers repatriated from Brussels go straight to London rather than Edinburgh, needed to change as it didn’t respect the integrity of devolution.
East Renfrewshire Tory MP Paul Masterton, who is at odds with many in his own party over Brexit – a position that recently saw him branded a “mutineer” on the front page of The Daily Telegraph – said he and his Scottish colleagues wanted reassurances that the government would make changes to the Bill.
“We will in exchange for supporting the government [in last night’s vote] require confirmation from ministers that they will expedite conversations with ministers in Scotland,” Masterton said.
Because he respected “the integrity of the Union,” Masterton said his support for UK government was “conditional” and should not be taken as support for Clause 11.
“There is much at stake here. If the above steps are not completed, legislative consent motions will not be granted by the devolved administrations and [the House of Lords] will not pass the Bill. l think that is not a situation that I genuinely believe any of us want to find ourselves in.”
In his speech SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said the Scottish Tories were the Prime Minister’s “poodles” and insisted he was willing to call on the Scottish Parliament to consent to the Withdrawal Bill, but only after substantial amendments.
Blackford called on the Scots Tory MPs to back changes to Clause 11 by doing more than just talking about putting pressure on government, and actually put pressure on government by voting with their SNP, Scottish Labour and Scottish Lib Dems colleagues.
“Conservative members that have been sent here from Scotland constituencies, are they going to defend the interests of the Scottish Parliament or are they simply going to go through the lobbies tonight and speak up for London?” Blackford asked. “We want to keep power where it belongs – in the Scottish Parliament.”
Moray’s Tory MP Douglas Ross queried this, saying “the SNP wants powers to come back from Europe to go to Scotland, for Scotland to be independent to shove these powers straight back to Europe.”
“Legally illiterate,” shouted Joanna Cherry.
Blackford went on: “Here we are 17 months after the referendum, no new powers for Scotland, in fact Brexit means Scotland losing powers.”
There was audible disagreement from the Tory front bench.
“I can hear huffing coming from the other side,” Blackford said. “I will let any member of the government rise now and name one power, just one, one power that’s coming back to Scotland.”
Mundell got to his feet: “All 111 powers were subject to discussion between the two governments, and the two governments will bring forward their proposals in due course. This power grab, this naming one power ... it’s pantomime.
“What this government is involved in is the reality of negotiating a way forward on this matter.”
Blackford dismissed Mundell as the “Government’s man in Scotland, rather than Scotland’s man in the government.”
Labour MP Ian Murray, who had tabled amendments, also questioned Scottish Tory claims to be standing up for Scotland. Ruth Davidson, he pointed out, had said the block of 13 Tory MPs elected in June would “fight the corner of Scotland”.
They had, Murray seemed to suggest, been got at by May’s Government. “One has to ask the ask question if Conservative members of parliament from Scotland in this house are indeed here under the flag of the Conservative leader Ruth Davidson or whether or not they’re under the flag of the whips office of the UK Government”.
The debate continued late into the night.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel